Single-family house on a slope, floor plan: timber frame construction and precast concrete basement

No, the last ones I uploaded are here: . The laundry chute is also marked on the ground floor and upper floor.

Reference values are there to be adhered to, preferably with more margin than the minimum requirement. There's no need to compare with the lowest standard...

What is this sentence about the lowest standard supposed to mean? Especially in relation to my sentence that it has to work for us?

The standard that you measured in your current apartment and are now using as a guideline for yourself!

Of course, one can always pick out part of the argument and make it ridiculous. Not exactly a nice argumentative style, but it probably fits the previous sentence.

... since the tone in this thread is unfortunately becoming very negative, ...

Maybe you should read through the thread again this evening and try to adopt a more positive attitude.

Of course, I can understand that when the draft receives incomprehensible criticism, one reacts somewhat irritated – hence my opening sentence: I’m not a fan of late discussions.

I had planned to schedule the bathroom this evening, but I’m saving myself that now.

Regards

The level you measured in your current apartment and now take as a guideline for yourself!

I did not take my apartment as a guideline, but tried it out because we find exactly the same situation there. And obviously, the sentence was meant differently than I understood it. The word level is simply ambiguous. Then I am, of course, sorry about that. But maybe you should also consider your post from my position.

I can of course understand that when the draft receives incomprehensible criticism, one may react somewhat impatiently

As I wrote at the beginning, I understood your sentence as personal criticism and naturally one reacts impatiently to that because it has no place here. Furthermore, I never said that the criticism is not understandable, but that I cannot make use of it regarding possible better options. The bathroom would work one way or another for us, but one wants to explore all other possibilities as well.

I had planned to design the bathroom this evening, but now I am saving myself that.

Unfortunately, I could not resist responding after all... but maybe we can steer the discussion in the right direction after all.

Hello everyone,

we sat down together again intensively over the weekend, discussed and experimented. In the end, we also found out what bothered us about the original architect’s design: it was simply the second wall in the shower. We are now going with the compromise of the double casement window above the toilet as originally planned, because by omitting the second wall we get a more open and brighter bathroom, more space for furniture and possibly even a heated towel rail. In addition, the shower becomes larger and more open:

So now the shower exit is at about 150 to 200 cm ceiling height? And only about 100 cm partition wall, the area under the sloping roof always gets nicely wet.

No, there is 200cm of headroom at 150cm.