Matt.712
2021-06-12 17:49:49
- #1
Hello everyone,
we have some questions regarding setback areas for which we need your assistance. To clarify, we have created a sketch that we refer to. We live in an end terrace house (House A) in Munich with two adjacent garages (A = own garage and foreign). The building envelope is very generously sized, so that next to the foreign garage a strip 4.2m wide can still be built on up to the building boundary. Our idea is that another house PLAN could be realized there. However, we do not know whether this is legally possible. For the houses beyond the public path, we can comply with the setback areas using the 16m privilege ½*H = 3.77m. Is that correct?
But how does it behave in relation to the foreign garage? Are setback areas to be observed here? A garage does not have a setback area and can be built directly onto a house. Conversely, can house PLAN be built directly onto the foreign garage? And is the consent of the owners of the foreign garage necessary for this?
Furthermore, it is unclear to us whether house PLAN means a continuation of the row of houses, since we are “building” it directly onto house A (through the wing in the west)? Must the setback areas between house PLAN and house A be observed here? And is the consent of the owners of the foreign garage necessary for this?
If the setback areas must be observed, is there possibly an exception or a compensation rule / balancing of interests that compensates us for the disadvantage caused by the foreign garage in the middle of the property and thus the significant restriction of the building project? Especially since the development plan (from 1983) did not provide for garages, but another house adjacent to house A.
Many thanks for the support and all the best!
Kind regards,
Matthias P.
Here again is the sketch:
[ATTACH width="527px" type="full"]62456[/ATTACH]
we have some questions regarding setback areas for which we need your assistance. To clarify, we have created a sketch that we refer to. We live in an end terrace house (House A) in Munich with two adjacent garages (A = own garage and foreign). The building envelope is very generously sized, so that next to the foreign garage a strip 4.2m wide can still be built on up to the building boundary. Our idea is that another house PLAN could be realized there. However, we do not know whether this is legally possible. For the houses beyond the public path, we can comply with the setback areas using the 16m privilege ½*H = 3.77m. Is that correct?
But how does it behave in relation to the foreign garage? Are setback areas to be observed here? A garage does not have a setback area and can be built directly onto a house. Conversely, can house PLAN be built directly onto the foreign garage? And is the consent of the owners of the foreign garage necessary for this?
Furthermore, it is unclear to us whether house PLAN means a continuation of the row of houses, since we are “building” it directly onto house A (through the wing in the west)? Must the setback areas between house PLAN and house A be observed here? And is the consent of the owners of the foreign garage necessary for this?
If the setback areas must be observed, is there possibly an exception or a compensation rule / balancing of interests that compensates us for the disadvantage caused by the foreign garage in the middle of the property and thus the significant restriction of the building project? Especially since the development plan (from 1983) did not provide for garages, but another house adjacent to house A.
Many thanks for the support and all the best!
Kind regards,
Matthias P.
Here again is the sketch:
[ATTACH width="527px" type="full"]62456[/ATTACH]