f-pNo
2016-04-14 10:39:30
- #1
or rather your experience with the review of documents is not entirely wrong.
This is what I meant by people of different stripes. Those who need the advice most urgently, because they take little care of themselves (want/can), will rather make less use of the service or, due to their insistence on their "well-founded half-knowledge," will talk your seminar down.
The people who seek information themselves will be quite active in looking around on their own. They will also be willing to spend money on a contract review / construction supervision. To what extent they will invest additional money in a seminar – if they know about the competence of the speaker – maybe. Because this saves them a lot of research work. However, most do not know you and are unaware of your knowledge and intentions.
We went to model home parks 3 times before we had the first conversations. We talked to 7 construction companies. I grilled our general contractor in over 10 conversations (before signing the contract). I visited several construction fairs and attended various lectures there (however, the costs for admission to the fair were very reasonable). We used the advice of the police. In addition, we also had a free initial appointment with an energy advisor. However, I could not bring myself to commission the energy advisor further (not because the conversation was bad, but because of financial pressure).
Certainly, I would have been happy if I had had ONE person who answered all my questions or pointed out various pitfalls. But – would I have trusted you (as an unknown speaker) or would I still have gone out afterward to check your statements? Based on my experience with the "consultation" at Stadt&Land, probably the latter. Then the effect of "knowledge from a single source" would have been pointless again.
PS: Now that I know you, I would book your seminar. But I have been active here for almost 3 years now.
This is what I meant by people of different stripes. Those who need the advice most urgently, because they take little care of themselves (want/can), will rather make less use of the service or, due to their insistence on their "well-founded half-knowledge," will talk your seminar down.
The people who seek information themselves will be quite active in looking around on their own. They will also be willing to spend money on a contract review / construction supervision. To what extent they will invest additional money in a seminar – if they know about the competence of the speaker – maybe. Because this saves them a lot of research work. However, most do not know you and are unaware of your knowledge and intentions.
We went to model home parks 3 times before we had the first conversations. We talked to 7 construction companies. I grilled our general contractor in over 10 conversations (before signing the contract). I visited several construction fairs and attended various lectures there (however, the costs for admission to the fair were very reasonable). We used the advice of the police. In addition, we also had a free initial appointment with an energy advisor. However, I could not bring myself to commission the energy advisor further (not because the conversation was bad, but because of financial pressure).
Certainly, I would have been happy if I had had ONE person who answered all my questions or pointed out various pitfalls. But – would I have trusted you (as an unknown speaker) or would I still have gone out afterward to check your statements? Based on my experience with the "consultation" at Stadt&Land, probably the latter. Then the effect of "knowledge from a single source" would have been pointless again.
PS: Now that I know you, I would book your seminar. But I have been active here for almost 3 years now.