DG
2016-03-15 17:13:17
- #1
Please compare exactly this number* to the costs of the additional financing over 42k.
I don’t know the exact figures any more than you do – but you’re right. Funny argument. Especially when you consider that with ~900€ (600€ loan costs and 300€ rental income) you can’t manage a full financing in 3 years at all. The financing must therefore have been previously funded with equity; you can figure that out on a beer coaster – the cost of the loan cannot therefore be calculated/estimated with additional financing over 42k€. The question is – how much equity was there at the purchase of the apartment and how high are the loan costs?
BUT: In the meantime he carries the risk of the rental apartment (maintenance, laws, rent nomads, owners’ association)
I don’t want to overwhelm you, but exactly for this risk you get an interest. You can also say: rent. It either sufficiently covers the risk or it doesn’t.
There are certainly situations where all this makes sense... but that is rather the exception.
Nothing but tedious repetitions of the same general theses. I’m interested in whether the exception applies here or not. You don’t care – your prejudice stands.
As a layperson you can phrase it like this too, but that is not the standard of this forum.
Best regards Dirk Grafe