Replace oil heating in a 60s house?

  • Erstellt am 2022-07-21 12:58:20

CC35BS38

2022-07-23 09:28:14
  • #1
Try it out in winter to see how low the flow temperature can go. Turn the radiators fully on. You should aim for around 40 degrees. At 50+ it already becomes very expensive and inefficient.
 

Deliverer

2022-07-23 12:15:33
  • #2
So: Up to 55° flow temperature, the use of modern heat pumps is NOT a cost trap. The heat pump only loses 13% efficiency compared to 35° flow temperature (study from last year).

And if that has already been done:

At most, the top floor ceiling or the roof is still missing. Then simply install a suitable heat pump and that's it.
If you want, you can still replace the radiators, then you can get down another 6-8 degrees.
 

WilderSueden

2022-07-23 12:20:52
  • #3

Well, I rather have such data sheets in mind. That is a bit more than 13%, even at rather mild temperatures. The whole combined with high heat demand...
 

driver55

2022-07-23 12:41:04
  • #4
So with "fever temperature" you definitely cannot heat a 60s house (without insulation measures) via radiators.
 

driver55

2022-07-23 12:55:00
  • #5
As far as theory or in the lab. COP instead of 5 still just above 4? :rolleyes: 50 degrees would be like producing hot water all year round. The annual performance factor would probably hover around 3. (I already see that with our VWS (brine), albeit from 2009, that anything above 45 degrees significantly reduces efficiency.) It would be nice if it were different, but I don’t believe in quantum leaps in heat pump technology. Brine heat pumps would then be virtually completely unnecessary.
 

Deliverer

2022-07-23 13:06:52
  • #6
You have to find the study from ifeu yourself - unfortunately, I am not allowed to provide a link. (And I have to correct myself, it was 14% more electricity between 35 and 55°)

And don’t get me (or the study) wrong: I am not advising anyone to go to 55°. But with that knowledge in mind, you don’t worry so much if you happen to need 45° flow temperature. And with 45°, you can already heat a lot of houses! And if nothing has been done to the house for 30 years, it shouldn’t be blamed on the heat pump now. Renovations are due anyway.
 

Similar topics
18.02.2014Solar heat pump / what to watch for in the offer (single-family house, new construction, KFW70)22
03.06.2016Trench collector brine-water heat pump or air-water heat pump?49
05.03.2015Sole heat pump flat collector 2 heating circuits13
19.09.2023Cooling via underfloor heating with brine heat pump45
19.05.2021Experiences with brine heat pump491
15.01.2018Is nighttime lowering of the heat pump sensible?13
01.02.2019Controlled residential ventilation with cooling: brine geothermal heat pump instead of air-to-water heat pump?30
25.03.2019Heating concept for single-family house new build approx. 190m²: Split heat pump vs. ground source (brine)13
28.03.2020Underfloor heating + radiator -> two thermostats in one room10
26.03.2022Which is more sensible: heat pump or insulation?33
07.12.2021Is a brine-water heat pump still worthwhile with KfW 40+?34
31.05.2022Do radiators always have to be placed under the windows in new buildings?41
03.08.202230000€ for an air-water heat pump?16
03.12.2022New heat pump for old buildings without renovation32
28.06.2023Sole-water heat pump with ground probe experiences?42
15.09.2023Basic info radiator replacement old building14
31.03.2024Which brine-water heat pump Viessmann, Niebe or Stiebel WPE-I 10 H12
11.02.2025KFW 40, Ground-water heat pump worthwhile or is air-water better?15

Oben