Purchase advice / Financial evaluation - 1950s house with attractive plot

  • Erstellt am 2022-11-24 21:52:18

Yosan

2023-01-29 20:46:01
  • #1
Interesting statement. In female fertility, 36 is still 36. Depending on the theory, a woman may even become less fertile faster because puberty and thus the consumption of eggs start earlier and there are only a limited number. Medical support may then be necessary, provided the wallet allows it ;-)
 

Tigerlily

2023-01-29 20:56:41
  • #2
100% agreement, but it always depends on the individual case and you cannot automatically assume that one child is only possible from 36 years onwards. By the way, younger couples also make use of medical support depending on medical indication; infertility is not only related to age. And yes, I know the field well :-( and yes, I have not only one child :-) By the way, my sentence continued further, please quote completely!
 

kati1337

2023-01-29 21:16:46
  • #3


Hmm, well, female humans are born with millions of egg cells, so there’s no such thing as "nothing left."
And the theory that it gets harder to get pregnant as you get older recently backfired on me. :D We also thought, "oh, if we lived close to family, having a second child would be nice." But since I’m turning 38 soon, we also assumed, "it might take a while," we’ll just let nature take its course and see what happens.
Yep, you can guess three times. :D
 

Yosan

2023-01-30 09:58:40
  • #4
Congratulations! I didn't mean to say that it necessarily gets difficult at 36 and certainly didn't want to attack anyone or anything like that. I just had to smile about the "nowadays" in this context.
 

Yosan

2023-01-30 10:01:09
  • #5
I didn't want to start any discussions or insinuate anything. I just had to smile about the "nowadays" in this context ;-)
 

kati1337

2023-01-30 10:25:45
  • #6
Thank you :D It was basically planned anyway, but we had more planned to welcome child number 2 in our new, finished house. But she was in such a hurry (2 weeks – bam, pregnant) that she will still live with us in our shabby interim house. And me being already pregnant when moving from the north to the southwest was also not planned. But we do not complain. Better this way than the other way around. I think the “nowadays” was more meant in the way that many women nowadays start family planning later? Like prioritizing education and career first and having the first children later. I am registered as a “high-risk pregnancy” this time, and my midwife looked at the maternity book and said it’s actually ridiculous. It gives women over 35 a bad feeling, although the vast majority of children are still born healthy. Medically, being over 35 is not yet the big problem. There are a few factors, and I believe the chance for genetic mutations increases a bit (especially trisomy 21 becomes more likely over 40). But otherwise? I personally find it a bit overrated. But it doesn’t bother me much to be considered “high-risk pregnant.” Basically, it’s the same as my first pregnancy. I think doctors just have free rein to monitor more closely / perform tests. I can’t say much about it, I had doctors both times who always did ultrasounds anyway, even if that wasn’t actually scheduled. So basically, apart from the marks in the book, nothing has changed.
 
Oben