Property acquisition tax notice for land same contract document

  • Erstellt am 2015-04-24 08:20:34

Bauexperte

2015-04-24 10:54:09
  • #1
Hello,


In principle, the case can be answered quite easily. If the land seller and the building supervisor (BU) have nothing to do with each other, no economic connection can be derived (BU procured the land for you, pointed out the vacancy of the land, etc.), the real estate transfer tax only applies to the part of the land costs. In all other cases, it is due on house + land.

See also:

Rhenish regards
 

b_user

2015-04-28 10:59:11
  • #2
Then I hope that the low property transfer tax remains.

The seller (city) has nothing to do with the construction management company, architect, or any other executing companies in my case.

Thank you very much for the feedback.
 

Vega82

2015-04-29 10:55:59
  • #3
In my opinion, you only get a problem if you have already signed the construction contract before purchasing the plot of land. Otherwise, it should be difficult to find a connection between the plot of land and the developer.
 

b_user

2015-04-29 11:47:15
  • #4
But that is exactly the case with me, as I already wrote in the first post. But should this questionnaire already have come then?
 

Musketier

2015-04-29 11:50:59
  • #5
Since the property was purchased by the city, it is quite possible that the tax office does not suspect any connection there and perhaps does not even send out questionnaires in such cases.
 

Vega82

2015-04-29 12:00:55
  • #6
That then does not necessarily have anything to do with a uniform contract. I already had a personal conversation with the tax office about it and did a lot of research. Since it was too risky for us, we only signed the construction contract after the land purchase.

The background is as follows:
The case law assumes that when you buy land, you are no longer free to decide how and with whom you want to build on the land if you have already signed a construction contract beforehand.
This allows taxation as a single contract.

It is absurd but it is definitely handled that way and is legally permissible.
However, if you have already received the notice, the matter should be settled.
 

Similar topics
03.08.2012Contract Supplement to the Construction Contract by the Developer36
01.12.2014Real estate transfer tax / what is the tax applied to? Which developer MUST?30
20.10.2014Preliminary contract with the general contractor for building a house after purchasing land16
26.12.2014No disbursement of funding - Tax office is slow44
05.02.2015Is it possible for the partner to contribute to the real estate transfer tax?11
02.09.2015Construction contract before financing24
06.12.2016Contract for work before property purchase - real estate acquisition tax?10
13.02.2017Soil survey before purchasing property?20
24.03.2017Property acquisition tax - Was everything calculated correctly?16
12.06.2017The tax office wants to know how we are financing our construction project50
29.11.2017Timeline of real estate acquisition tax and house construction contract20
31.12.2017Construction financing - duration of land purchase / house construction13
08.01.2018Finance the purchase of land yourself in advance or wait?17
19.03.2019Planning of a classic single-family house with approx. 127 sqm25
10.05.2019Subcontract before purchasing the property?30
30.01.2020Tax office questionnaire for the assessment of real estate transfer tax11
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
16.01.2021Property purchase - Risk of a "linked transaction"?61
16.05.2023Consumer credit for land purchase?19
16.02.20254 years after construction, the office also demands land acquisition tax on the house96

Oben