guckuck2
2019-03-26 19:35:44
- #1
I agree with the first sentence in the case of Germany.
The storage costs of >30ct/kWh were correct about 2 years ago. That's when I bought my storage system, and it has about 31ct/kWh.
Nowadays you can implement a storage system for under 25ct/kWh. With appropriate demand and design, I have already seen offers for under 20ct/kWh. In 5-7 years, a storage system will almost certainly be cheaper than feed-in and repurchase without the Renewable Energy Act.
Regards, Nika
Really? Do you have a calculation example for that?
I just quickly looked for a storage system in an online shop. NeeoBASIX 6.5 for €6790. Nominal capacity 6.5 kWh, usable capacity 5.5 kWh. Expected cycles 5000. That means 27,500 kWh go in and out, without considering storage losses or standby power (winter time!). €6790 acquisition cost divided by 27,500 kWh is 24.7 cents per kWh purely for the acquisition cost of the storage system. Without labor, without accessories. Plus ~4 cents VAT on self-consumption.
Photovoltaic power generation about 5 cents/kWh, plus storage price 25 cents/kWh, VAT 4 cents/kWh. That makes at least 34 cents/kWh for a self-generated, temporarily stored and then self-consumed kWh of electricity. That this is nonsense is obvious, as ordinary grid supply would already be significantly (!) cheaper.
My suggestion:
Photovoltaic power generation about 5 cents/kWh, minus feed-in tariff 12 cents/kWh. That makes 7 cents profit. Nighttime repurchase from the electricity supplier here 23 cents, which effectively means 16 cents for the kWh of electricity in the oh-so-expensive electricity storage "power grid". That is cheaper than any electricity tariff a private customer can get.
Better is, of course, only the direct self-consumption, which comes to about 9 cents/kWh due to generation costs plus VAT.