I do not like the proportions in the exterior views at all. Flat roofs for the extension and garage compared to the tall building complex. The ribbon windows on the front are again way too big, overall way too many window variants used.
Is the house supposed to be divided into 2 units later, or why is the staircase placed in a poor layout position? But I don’t see a separate apartment upstairs later.
Guest WC: have you ever used a sink with a depth of 30 cm? Or should I say: wetted? Comfort looks different — and maybe you should also consider that you might get visitors who are larger in build.
I love openness in a house, but if the postman can look at my sofa and I obviously stand with my back to the front door while working/cooking, then something was planned wrong here. There are hardly any partition walls. An effect podium wall doesn’t look good everywhere either and is supposed to fix a planning mistake here again.
I don’t understand how anyone can find these 45-degree walls attractive. Ultimately, they were created because otherwise it is not possible to connect the rooms (in the tight space of a terraced house it has its justification, but not in a spacious house). It also does not fit at all with the Bauhaus style, which is supposed to be recognizable from the outside?!
Basically, you can definitely build a nice single-family house on this plot — whether a 2-story, white plastered house with a flat roof fits into the surroundings, we cannot assess. For me, however, the site plan looks like old existing housing, so I exclude this case this time. Basically, you should commission an architect with the planning (or a general contractor), but it will probably be the case that you have to adhere to the neighboring buildings if there is no development plan!
What do the houses look like there?
asks Yvonne
P.s. if anything here overlaps with an old post, it is because I did not update before I started writing 3 hours ago :oops:
