Orientation of house in new development area in Brandenburg

Eight times eight and a half and single-story is too much to die and too little to live, I would say.

Calm down, someone might take it seriously later snob...

Calm down, otherwise someone might actually take that seriously snob...

Well, that leaves around 60 sqm without interior walls on the ground floor. That's quite a challenge. That's also why I asked about already existing plans.

These are my considerations so far.

What is particularly important to you? The south terrace, minimizing construction costs, distance to the forest, distance to neighbors? You have the choice! Here is my interpretation of your plans and statements:

Where would you build your house on this plot?

Since I do not value a south-facing garden:

Sixty-eight square meters of built-up area result in approximately fifty-four square meters of living space on the ground floor, together probably only about eighty-one, even with a generous knee wall hardly more than ninety - indeed, the question of concrete proof of sufficiency almost insistently arises. Building only a midsize tiny house on 589 sqm x floor area ratio 0.4 x II borders on land waste.

Yes, exactly a gable roof. We also considered the orientation, but we want the slopes on the shorter walls so that we have more straight surfaces.

Height of the building structure 10m. Otherwise, there are no specifications.

That rather sounds like a shed roof on a straight-wall "knee wall."

First of all, thanks to everyone who took the time, I read everything carefully!

Eight times eight and a half and single-story is too much to die for and not enough to live, I would say. Bordering the forest, I’m surprised not to read about a tree-fall boundary. Development via the neighboring property surprises me again.

yes, our little house is small. Less to clean and I don’t like such huge rooms, I always feel a bit lost in them.
Both people living here don’t even reach 1.65m, so maybe we have a bit more space than tall people then.
Also, there are only two of us and we will definitely stay two.
I calculated and downstairs we have about 57.8 sqm.
I’m also living now in 52 sqm and still alive.

With the connection via the neighboring property, honestly, I don’t understand that? We have a house connection at the driveway.
I didn’t find anything about a tree-fall boundary, but I’m attaching the entire development plan.
EDIT: I can’t attach it, but if interested, it is very easy to find online under development plan Wünsdorfer Sonnengärten.

I would move the house (without regard for the bright pine forest and/or view) all the way to the north and mediate with the carport on the east. That creates a nice southwest garden.
The connections usually include 15 meters of laying on the property. Additional meters are not that expensive, especially since you don’t have a parking space property. You can inquire about the costs at your municipality.
Do you already have plan documents for the floor plan discussion?

Posting my planned floor plan here after the reactions to our midsize tiny house being called land waste – I don’t know.
It is also not finished yet and I hope to get help from the architect (who is included with our provider) to fit everything in (since the house is tiny).

We are currently asking various providers about the lines, thanks for the tip about the 15m.

Posting my planned floor plan here, after the reactions to our midsize tiny house as land waste - I don’t know.
It’s not finished yet either, and I’m hoping for help from the architect (who is included by our provider) to fit everything in (since the house is tiny).

Go ahead. I’m always happy when someone tries to accommodate all needs in a small space and I like to support that very much. Planning 160+ houses is a bit boring.
And if too many rudenesses annoy you, just block the user... and everyone stays happy