Our current calculation for everything looks like this (hope this is enough as information):
Land: €80,000
Real estate transfer tax/notary (7.5%): €6,000
House itself: €220,000 (133.94 m² or 120.19 m² living area + waterproof basement)
House connection costs: €12,000
Survey/building application: €2,100
Construction water/construction electricity provision: €1,000
Soil report: €550
Land-specific work (soil removal, filling, clearing, etc.…): €10,000
Other incidental construction costs (various official procedures): €3,500
Outdoor facilities: €5,000 (I know this will only cover the roughest)
95 sqm laminate ~ €20: €2,000
Wallpaper: €2,500
We are still planning an external construction supervisor: I hope we are not too far off with ~€4,000
Total: ~€350,000
This is what my estimate looks like:
Land: TEUR 80
Single-family house according to KfW 70: TEUR 214
Usable basement made of waterproof concrete and executed as a white tank: TEUR 48 (without additional costs due to exposed masonry)
5-phase inspection during the construction period; e.g., TÜV: TEUR 3.5
Incidental construction costs: TEUR 40
Painting/flooring work in EL: TEUR 20
Outdoor facilities in EL: TEUR 10 (only the essentials)
Reserves for extras: TEUR 10
Estimated all in: TEUR 425.5 for RP.
We are now some thousand euros apart; if I base your price expectations for painting work and flooring as well as outdoor facilities (knowing well that you will not make it with that), only TEUR 45.5 remain; but that is also money.
In my estimate, I have not yet taken into account the additional costs due to a slight slope; these can only be calculated precisely once the terrain is filled. But there could also be several thousand euros lurking here. However, based on your information, I cannot see that it is a real slope. Are you sure you should not better add fill? It would be fatal to have to bring the water (rainwater in this case) from the street—with a higher level—to the single-family house. It would also be cheaper than a basement; especially executed as a waterproof basement. Even in the case of filling, there would be substantial additional costs, but in my opinion better invested and cheaper than the other option.
PS: the competitor, among other things, likes to work with truss roofs to visually lower the sales price. However, the requirements for truss roofs have increased. The timbers that are still allowed to be used now are considerably more expensive than the supplier’s calculations assumed in the past. Conclusion: a truss roof is not cost-effective.
Rhenish greetings