Currently, about 1.9 million apartments in various buildings are vacant (Census + Empirica). Overall, we do not have a housing shortage. Of the mentioned vacancies, about 1/3 were ready for occupancy within the next three months.
But the apartments are not located where many want to live. That is the much bigger problem.
Yes, that is absolutely true.
Now one wonders why refugees or citizens receiving basic income have to live in Hamburg, Munich, or another metropolitan area with a housing shortage at all?
Why does the state, which also pays the rent for the apartments, not control the housing industry? It cannot be that the police officer or the saleswoman in Munich cannot find an apartment while the citizen receiving basic income then has their apartment paid for by the state.
One gets the impression that the state even promotes the housing shortage by doing so.
Advertisements only briefly online
Rent madness in Berlin: 43,000 applicants for 288 apartments in 30 minutes.
Those are the effects. No sign of almost 2 million vacant apartments.
I still remember the saying, "He who pays commands." And if the state covers the rental costs, then it can and should also determine where the recipient should live. Then one wonders about clan formation and unwillingness to integrate.
But instead of Berlin, one could also live in Neuruppin or Dessau. In Dessau, living space is even being destroyed with state funding (demolition premiums). But that is only one of many problems in Germany.
It is like at the bakery. The rolls became more expensive last year because grain prices soared. That was the reasoning given.
This year, grain prices have halved. Has a single baker lowered the prices for rolls? Not to my knowledge.
Two years ago, they advertised building plots here. 50 euros per square meter, even nice location with a view, etc. Suddenly up to 75 euros.
I ask myself why? Well, because prices are rising everywhere. But nothing has changed regarding the plot itself. No value-influencing measures at all.