Minergie yes or no?!

  • Erstellt am 2009-04-21 17:02:41

Nicole-1

2009-04-21 17:02:41
  • #1
:confused:

Who has tips/experiences for the decision Minergie construction yes or no?!

Our architect cannot give us any proper decision aids...
he himself decided against it in his own house (comfort ventilation).
 

GiBi-1

2009-05-06 15:06:19
  • #2
is, in my opinion, a financing question. High investment costs and low operating costs compared to lower investment costs, etc.

Freely following the philosophy that the rich save more easily :)

Minergie-P or even passive house?
Your architect should get moving..

You can also achieve the values and everything without comfort ventilation if you are allergic.

Minergie is great. If you also have a good stove/wood stove, you are very independent from everything.

My tip: ask someone who lives in a Minergie house.
 

Argyle-1

2009-05-11 22:54:12
  • #3
Attention, this argument is often heard from salespeople and is not entirely correct. If you mean the insulation values, you can certainly achieve them. But a comfort ventilation system has a heat exchanger. That means the warm used air from inside transfers its energy to the fresh air from outside. This results in savings in heating. Of course, you don't have this saving with conventional ventilation. You can insulate as much as you want. On the other hand, if you have walls made of stone (brick, sand-lime brick), they store the heat and when you air out vigorously, you are actually only cooling the room air. The room should warm up again relatively quickly. A ventilation system constantly renews the room air, which also has advantages. Such a comfort ventilation system can be equipped with a pollen filter, which actually benefits allergy sufferers. The problem with ventilations is probably more the dry air. Regards Argyle
 

GiBi-1

2009-05-14 04:23:10
  • #4
That's exactly what I meant :)

Comfort ventilation is OK, as long as the residents don't still throw the windows wide open.
The thing with the pollen filter is supposed to be useless. I believe it's also about dust.

Regards
 

Dämmunsinn-1

2009-08-22 16:42:21
  • #5
Hello Nicole

Forget Minergie. And build a brick house. With radiant heating. That way you get an A on the energy certificate. Insulated houses only get an F.

Best regards from Dämmunsinn
 

Dämmunsinn-1

2009-08-23 11:26:45
  • #6
Insulation nonsense

Hey Gibi

Minergie: I can't hear that word anymore. It's just a money-making scheme.

All insulated houses will get an F, maybe even an E. That's why we will soon hear nothing more about this energy certificate for buildings.

Statics: four bricks would be enough to carry the weight of a single-family house.

Insulation nonsense
 

Similar topics
19.07.2018Draw the plan yourself? Do you necessarily need an architect?11
18.02.2011Architect totally messed up - experiences?17
30.09.2012Final invoice architect13
27.10.2013Architect --> Agreements? What is that?21
16.04.2014Cost of soil survey - Does the architect pay or do we?12
16.09.2014Termination of collaboration with architect - demands excessive fee28
01.10.2014Collaboration with an architect - how does it work properly?22
25.02.2015Planning / Architect, involvement of specialist planners for the approval plan10
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
26.04.2015Semi-detached house architect or general contractor / prefabricated house or solid construction13
27.12.2015Who has built with an architect? Experiences??85
11.09.2015Building a garage on the boundary is not possible according to the architect.11
17.11.2015Is an architect really that expensive?46
05.04.2020Developer or architect - costs43
07.03.2016Various dimensions architect execution drawing12
23.09.2016Architect and budget limit... insurance? possibilities25
17.04.2017Civil Engineer vs. Architect17
13.06.2017Architect or developer? Which is more affordable?13
24.06.2017Construction ancillary costs: Bank requires signature from the architect16
10.11.2017House plan by architect 2 floors with basement18

Oben