Log house in solid wood or post-and-beam construction - experiences?

Then solid wood is missing in the list

Not only that, because ...

Advantage of timber frame construction: - short setup time thanks to prefabricated component groups

... would also apply to other panel construction methods (also with bricks, expanded clay, concrete, etc.).

I am satisfied with my solid wood house without visible wood

I don’t count you among the blue-green farmer trap target group either

Cheap answer from a seller who is afraid for his arguments!
10% higher construction costs for 50% less heating costs sounds more like spending over €25,000 more and saving €30 per month in expenses.
Don’t tell me about spending and saving! I’ve calculated it and won’t be fooled by sales talk!

Based on your argument, I wonder how you calculated that...
You don’t even have arguments – I’d like to see the calculation. €25,000 extra cost? For what? To go from a timber frame wall 0.5 to 0.2 (that was the first thing I said that you jumped on) costs maybe €3,000–4,000 at most. You almost recoup that with the smaller required heating system...

Lucrezia do you really want to always see wooden walls, wooden floors, wooden ceilings?

I wonder the same, but inside the walls can be designed in any way (for example, I am thinking of a mix with Fermacell, clay boards...). Outside you can work with linseed oil paints. @U-value: like everything in life, it is relative. Wood radiates a cozy warmth from the house. It may be that this is perceived subjectively and cannot be measured. @Schickimicki: Oh really? The log house owners I have met are uncomplicated people who have pitched in themselves (partly built it themselves). Nothing to do with naked dancing in the full moon among their yard chickens. Having prejudices, on the other hand, is evenly spread among the population.

I only meant that it sounded like TE wanted to build a completely untreated house. That is not possible.

If you look at the pages of pure log house providers (I would like to name names, but I prefer not to get banned), you will find that the wood is dried at high heat (which is clearly not very ecological). This denatures the proteins, wood is no longer susceptible to parasites and moisture and requires no further treatments. @Wall of a log house: it can be made of round logs (which I would not choose, I don’t like the look and I imagine that dirt accumulates in the gaps) or, as mentioned here once, from 2 layers of wooden boards, and cork/jute/wood fiber in the middle. In my case: 14 cm wood + approx. 15 cm cork insulation, with a U-value of 0.20 W/m²K.

I need to look up the exact numbers. Our shell construction cost a five-figure amount more as a passive house (10-25k, I don't remember exactly) than the same house built to KFW 55 standards. This was offset by the elimination of underfloor heating, which is simply a luxury in a passive house. Of course, the windows and the cost of the second blower door test are manageable. Lucrezia, the plasterers who plastered our house said: "Too bad there won't be a follow-up order here anytime soon, no visible timber." So far, they have clad visible timber on every house again within a few years. For me, wooden furniture, wooden floors, wooden ceilings, and wooden walls are too much. Think it over carefully.

So far, they have clad every house with exposed wood again within a few years. For me, wooden furniture, wooden floors, wooden ceilings, wooden walls would be too much. Think it over carefully.

You mean inside, right? - I would only leave the exterior walls with exposed wood + then treat them with white lime to keep them bright. The rest would be colorful or white. Especially in the practice rooms, white should prevail. Are you allowed to say here who you built with, or via PM? Or have you reported about it somewhere?