Laundry chute is difficult because the utility room is not located under the bathroom.
I would consider the entire plan as a sample drawing for now.
This is a widespread misunderstanding among architects, that the construction plan should only plan the building. No, it must also take into account that the building "adapts to its use." Washing is part of living.
The airlock was also intentionally designed so that groceries/drink crates or, for example, dirty shoes do not have to be carried across the apartment.
...but it should then take on more (e.g., household-related) functions or be less generously sized.
but since construction is on an existing building, the building authority apparently insists on the construction method.
The building authority must adhere to the development plan. Where there is one, what is stated there applies (or what the overarching state building regulations govern), nothing more. The requirement of §34 for integration cannot be added on top when a development plan already exists.
Do you all only have one car and get by with one bathroom?
I think most builders have only one of two cars, for which a closed garage would be critical for preserving value. If the outer garage were a carport, the visual ratio of car building to human building would be more appropriate, possibly also simplifying thermal aspects.