Large impact joints in the shell construction still within acceptance or defect?

  • Erstellt am 2020-12-14 11:59:24

11ant

2020-12-22 18:50:05
  • #1

Correct, mortared. This does NOT mean stuffing them with mortar when you can only access from two sides anymore - but also from above and logically BEFORE the next layer. They probably consider laypeople to be extremely stupid.
 

Bookstar

2020-12-22 20:15:23
  • #2
absolute rubbish what he is delivering there. Does he even use [Dämmmörtel] or is he just smearing in ordinary mortar? I would check that too!!
 

Kishihmen

2020-12-23 09:34:18
  • #3


Yes, they definitely do :(



No, he uses insulating mortar, he even showed it to me at the construction site....

But it goes on. He did not cover the masonry and was last on site on Friday. It has rained heavily the last few days.
I don’t know if this might actually be a new topic, but what would be your recommendation on how to proceed (aside from complaining and demanding that the masonry be covered in the future)
 

Bookstar

2020-12-23 10:22:48
  • #4
If the masonry is filled with mineral wool, then you can really tear it down soon. If it is unfilled, it should also be covered, but not much will happen if it is not covered. Would point that out and leave it at that.
 

11ant

2020-12-23 11:50:14
  • #5
As far as I know, the processing instructions are part of the approval, so they are essentially part of the formulation of the building material - observing them is not goodwill, but part of complying with standards. According to all processing instructions known to me, masonry crowns must be covered at the end of every working day, even if it is not followed by a weekend. Unfilled bricks are at least not quite as much debris as filled ones, but still, rain can run through the bed joint and stand in the chambers on the mortar and react with it. Constant dripping hollow out the mortar ;-) I would therefore complain about the defect and refer to it again later during the final inspection. Don't you have an expert as a construction supervisor?
 

Kishihmen

2020-12-23 13:16:30
  • #6


Yes, in retrospect I have made some mistakes, but luckily building without an expert was not one of them. The expert was last here for the inspection of the basement. According to plan, he will come next when the ceiling is in place. We have already rearranged here and commissioned an interim inspection before pouring the basement ceiling.

Also, the shell construction was supposed to have a height of 2.55 m. However, the builder has now built 10 rows with 25 cm bricks and says he will just set the ceiling a bit higher (I am also not convinced that will work).

Despite everything, I want to avoid errors as much as possible until the expert inspects the building and keep the damage as low as possible ....

Oh, and the bricks are not filled.
 

Similar topics
07.09.2012Single-layer masonry vs. double-layer masonry with ETICS19
03.07.2023Construction supervision by an expert?17
27.03.2014Interior walls upper floor lightweight construction instead of masonry?12
26.10.2015Have the house inspected by a professional / expert?12
08.09.2016Window connection / reveal in double-leaf masonry24
09.11.2019Sound problem: Does noise come through masonry - through the exterior plaster?20
13.05.2018Two-layer masonry for residential basement on a slope - experiences?10
04.04.2023What is more expensive? Masonry or windows?21
15.01.2023Masonry from Ytong 24 or 30 for single-family house?53
03.09.2019Should the gap transition from the roof box to the masonry be closed or not?11
11.05.2021Which masonry is suitable for noise level range III24
03.06.2022Masonry - Closing/filling the wall behind the underfloor heating manifold14
17.08.2022Masonry is crumbling! Is there a risk of collapse?15
10.10.2023Disposable e-cigarette disposed of in the masonry13

Oben