Bauexperte
2015-01-12 14:27:43
- #1
Hello,
so that I can answer you understandably, I have to put the cart before the horse a little bit.
Over the years, I have met many good craftsmen; very few of them can handle tender documents or properly differentiate between their own and work unrelated to their trade.
That is - no matter whose favor your decision falls in - always a good choice!
Stick to this path!
For a business economist, you have a rather destructive attitude...
Problems in construction – as everywhere else – always arise when many people work on a project. This is sometimes very annoying, but in the vast majority of cases only a little nerve-wracking; exceptions of course confirm the rule here too. It always depends on how the solution looks and is implemented, right? Btw, this is also what differentiates reputable from less reputable providers (to give the common expression for such providers a new term).
Then you have so far chosen the wrong providers. The vast majority of nationwide general contractors/total contractors/builders work quite properly and have a good, medium-level equipment in their service descriptions. More is always possible, no question – for such cases, I always label the position “reserves for extras.” However, if you are following in the footsteps of Stadt & Land, the faction of trailer hitch fans or similar, then this statement does not really surprise me.
You know that with the choice of architect after the tender, with a general contractor already in the offer.
Sloped plots tend to have the highest rate of requiring additional foundation costs; I haven’t even mentioned embankment measures yet.
You give up quickly...
There is plenty of saving potential in your construction project; starting with the choice of plot and ending with the house size. 185 sqm is quite a number; 150 sqm and arranged to be practical for everyday life is often a very good alternative... if not often even the better choice.
I won’t comment further on existing properties; you will find enough info about that here on the HBF.
I don’t believe interest rates will rise in the near future (2-4 years); but what will happen in 10 years no one can answer you seriously. Why don’t you simply take the obvious path?
Find a reputable provider (the home builder diaries here provide good tips, as do new residential areas) and have them create a design fitting your preferred plot and life situation (have you reserved/bought it?) and price it with a fixed-price offer. Then you will know quite precisely what this “house building” thing will cost you with general contractors with comparable service descriptions. If you also give him insight into the soil report, even better. In parallel, you can have talks with architects and get an impression of their person and their offer and expected costs (don’t forget to ask very clearly up front for a “free” consultation).
Prepared this way, you can in my opinion first decide whether you want to build a house or not. Burying your head in the sand won’t get you anywhere in 10 years either.
Rhenish regards
so that I can answer you understandably, I have to put the cart before the horse a little bit.
I know people who would trust themselves to evaluate and select (all craftsmen themselves)
Over the years, I have met many good craftsmen; very few of them can handle tender documents or properly differentiate between their own and work unrelated to their trade.
and I would go through the tender together with a building expert anyway.
That is - no matter whose favor your decision falls in - always a good choice!
I just follow the maxim: Don’t do business with your friends.
Stick to this path!
One must also be honest here: If there is a fixed price (e.g. developer), then savings can only be made on quality if problems/further costs arise during the construction project.
The sub-sub story is mostly such that not the most reasonably priced provider gets the contract, but the cheapest.. And to be cheap, only personnel & material can be saved on. (Machines cost money and are indispensable...)
For a business economist, you have a rather destructive attitude...
Problems in construction – as everywhere else – always arise when many people work on a project. This is sometimes very annoying, but in the vast majority of cases only a little nerve-wracking; exceptions of course confirm the rule here too. It always depends on how the solution looks and is implemented, right? Btw, this is also what differentiates reputable from less reputable providers (to give the common expression for such providers a new term).
We also looked at some developers and their service descriptions – the tenor is: In the sample selection, the lower price is usually assumed (e.g., 20 euros per sqm of tiles), some special editions of bathroom fixtures and/or the minimum amount of sockets. Sample upgrades or other special requests (like underfloor heating) are expensive to pay for…
Then you have so far chosen the wrong providers. The vast majority of nationwide general contractors/total contractors/builders work quite properly and have a good, medium-level equipment in their service descriptions. More is always possible, no question – for such cases, I always label the position “reserves for extras.” However, if you are following in the footsteps of Stadt & Land, the faction of trailer hitch fans or similar, then this statement does not really surprise me.
That is exactly my biggest problem, that I cannot estimate something like whether it’s about 2000, 5000, 10000.
You know that with the choice of architect after the tender, with a general contractor already in the offer.
Again such a risk point: stagnant water and/or seepage water. That means with the 10k I’m not on the safe side, right? Or is there theoretically a residual risk that it could become more expensive due to the slope/gradient?
Sloped plots tend to have the highest rate of requiring additional foundation costs; I haven’t even mentioned embankment measures yet.
Thank you very much! – That settles the construction project, especially because of the risk regarding the plot.
You give up quickly...
There is plenty of saving potential in your construction project; starting with the choice of plot and ending with the house size. 185 sqm is quite a number; 150 sqm and arranged to be practical for everyday life is often a very good alternative... if not often even the better choice.
But let’s see what the current low interest policy and the inflated construction and real estate prices will bring in 10 years…
I won’t comment further on existing properties; you will find enough info about that here on the HBF.
I don’t believe interest rates will rise in the near future (2-4 years); but what will happen in 10 years no one can answer you seriously. Why don’t you simply take the obvious path?
Find a reputable provider (the home builder diaries here provide good tips, as do new residential areas) and have them create a design fitting your preferred plot and life situation (have you reserved/bought it?) and price it with a fixed-price offer. Then you will know quite precisely what this “house building” thing will cost you with general contractors with comparable service descriptions. If you also give him insight into the soil report, even better. In parallel, you can have talks with architects and get an impression of their person and their offer and expected costs (don’t forget to ask very clearly up front for a “free” consultation).
Prepared this way, you can in my opinion first decide whether you want to build a house or not. Burying your head in the sand won’t get you anywhere in 10 years either.
Rhenish regards