It's crazy what all this can entail...
Depending on the direction of the ridge, the extension is, as said, a simple operation, but perpendicular to that, of course, it's different.
but that there are still "grids" was not confirmed at all in our research! I don't know if this is still the case with the low-budget providers? Or just a prejudice from the past?
Yes and no. The grids are still a reality in production, but they no longer mean the usual planning corset of the past. One can imagine this similarly to ceiling beams or rafters, where respective pitches can be "shifted" or replacements can be made. That means economically, planning is still done on a grid and changes in whole grid increments are easier to implement, but on request "made to measure" also works for almost any desired dimensions. The preferred step lengths for enlargement jumps are 62.5 cm for timber frame panel builders and 1.00 meter for bricklayers.
I'll toss the opposite into the ring, downsizing the house. Of course, that was no problem either and led to a corresponding credit.
With houses as with breasts, the enlargement operation is the easier of the two procedures.
The sample building proposals are tested and functionally planned. If you reduce such a floor plan, bottlenecks would occur in some places and the shifting starts, often as a domino effect following the example of