Is the financing offer good?

  • Erstellt am 2015-03-18 13:08:10

Fußballer90

2015-03-18 17:08:50
  • #1
All right! Thank you very much.
 

toxicmolotof

2015-03-18 17:12:36
  • #2
You're welcome. The important thing is that you understand the financing system being offered to you, the resulting costs, and that you feel comfortable in the end. For options consisting of 100% or maybe 90% TA loans, I can hardly imagine that.
 

HilfeHilfe

2015-03-19 07:31:59
  • #3
Tell me, why always the Bausparvertrag variants. Just have regular annuity loans offered to you.
 

toxicmolotof

2015-03-19 08:02:05
  • #4
Why, well... maximum commission... or something like that...

There is nothing wrong with a building society savings contract as part-financing (max 1/3 of the total costs) or even as a subordinated TA loan behind a normal construction financing. Sometimes Riester is even sensible with 2 or more already existing children, but a proper integration of it leads to double work and only a fraction of the maximum possible commission.

Every seller/agent/advisor who recommends a complete building society contract financing should get a slap or (because it is not forbidden) alternatively provide a plausible and comprehensible justification. And it usually ends right at that last point.
 

Payday

2015-03-28 23:35:43
  • #5
what’s with all the building savings plan nonsense = there are currently hefty loans under 2% effective for 25 years. depending on the rate, set it for 15 or 20 years (or also 25) and put everything under one hat. if you want to finish somehow faster with special payments or skip them and just pay the amount throughout the term and that’s it. no games in a few years and planning certainty until the end. building savings plan games are usually only for buyers who are not really solvent (e.g. divorced men who pay for 2-3 children and don’t get over minimum wage). with your equity share, any bank will gladly take you. try going to another one. ps: your real estate transfer tax is ridiculously low. with us, 10,000 bucks would have been lost to the state alone—
 

Sebastian79

2015-03-29 08:25:36
  • #6
Don't talk nonsense - that has nothing to do with creditworthiness. And there are only "fat" loans for under 2% in the long term (over 25 years) if two things are ideal: first-class income and the lowest loan-to-value ratio.

And the latter is rarely achieved anymore through equity given the incredibly high land and construction prices nowadays...
 

Similar topics
03.05.2011KfW loan okay or is there a cheaper option?10
19.02.2013Is a Riester loan useful for my case?13
28.04.2013U-values heat loss according to regulation, comparison for KfW85 loan12
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
14.07.2020Beginnings of a possible property | Questions about the building savings contract72
02.06.2016Multifamily house - Building savings contract & pre-financing sensible?24
27.06.2016Building savings contract or annuity loan - final decision!45
10.02.2017Is financing a new building feasible?65
27.02.2018Old home savings contract - what should you do with it?31
27.02.2018Buying a house - Are we creditworthy? Building savings contract?14
06.03.2018Building savings contract and Wohnriester - Where is the catch here?28
17.09.2018No special repayments possible with loans. How to save money?15
21.06.2019Larger loan with only 5 years interest fixation14
16.04.2020Building savings contract as interest rate protection or put the money into special repayment?10
14.05.2020Financing Land & House - 2 Different Loans34
09.08.2020Refinance existing loans with a construction loan211
11.01.2021Financing offer: TA loan with building savings contract24
19.01.2021Are banks granting loans more restrictively?27
06.03.2023Is a building savings contract with a high outstanding debt sensible as partial security?17

Oben