BananaJoe
2020-12-06 16:00:10
- #1
Hello everyone,
I am currently unsure whether we need a backflow prevention device for our construction project or not. Our architect was only somewhat helpful and said that we "actually" don't need one, but if we wanted to be on the safe side, of course, we could have one installed.
The following key data:
The property is connected to a separate sewer system.
We are building without a basement and there is no shower on the ground floor, meaning the lowest wastewater connection in the house should be the toilet on the ground floor.
The property is located on a slightly sloping street (on the plan sloping from top to bottom). Attached are the city's drainage plan as well as a section of the planned house, both with height indications.
The city’s drainage ordinance contains no information about the backflow level, which, according to my understanding, means that the street level is the backflow level (if this is wrong, please correct me).
From this, I derive the following picture:
- The nearest manhole cover above our property is at 163.52m NHN (according to the plan our surveyor created for our building application, at 163.48m NHN), the nearest downstream manhole cover at 162.23m NHN.
- Top of the floor slab is at 163.30m NHN, plus 0.18m floor construction, plus approx. 0.20m to the toilet drain = 163.68m NHN
As a layperson, I would conclude from this that a backflow prevention device is not necessary, since the lowest drain is 16 (or 20) cm higher than the nearest upstream manhole cover. Correct?
However, I wonder why the architect said that I could "of course install a backflow prevention device to be on the safe side." Sure, I can simply ask him, but I first wanted to educate myself here so that I can better assess his answer.
Thank you all in advance and have a nice 2nd Advent!


I am currently unsure whether we need a backflow prevention device for our construction project or not. Our architect was only somewhat helpful and said that we "actually" don't need one, but if we wanted to be on the safe side, of course, we could have one installed.
The following key data:
The property is connected to a separate sewer system.
We are building without a basement and there is no shower on the ground floor, meaning the lowest wastewater connection in the house should be the toilet on the ground floor.
The property is located on a slightly sloping street (on the plan sloping from top to bottom). Attached are the city's drainage plan as well as a section of the planned house, both with height indications.
The city’s drainage ordinance contains no information about the backflow level, which, according to my understanding, means that the street level is the backflow level (if this is wrong, please correct me).
From this, I derive the following picture:
- The nearest manhole cover above our property is at 163.52m NHN (according to the plan our surveyor created for our building application, at 163.48m NHN), the nearest downstream manhole cover at 162.23m NHN.
- Top of the floor slab is at 163.30m NHN, plus 0.18m floor construction, plus approx. 0.20m to the toilet drain = 163.68m NHN
As a layperson, I would conclude from this that a backflow prevention device is not necessary, since the lowest drain is 16 (or 20) cm higher than the nearest upstream manhole cover. Correct?
However, I wonder why the architect said that I could "of course install a backflow prevention device to be on the safe side." Sure, I can simply ask him, but I first wanted to educate myself here so that I can better assess his answer.
Thank you all in advance and have a nice 2nd Advent!