Is a ventilation system cost-effective? Does it save money?

  • Erstellt am 2025-06-06 11:28:52

Lüftermax

2025-06-10 13:52:26
  • #1
I assume that you installed the decentralized system during a renovation. It is clear that the threshold here is lower than running pipes throughout the entire house (as with a centralized system). Of course, this comes at the expense of efficiency.

I can only agree with my predecessors that the calculation here is not quite that simple and depends on too many factors to make reliable statements. If we assume that in the end (perhaps after about 15 years) you break even, it has still been a good investment, because you have significantly better air, no mold/pollen/dirty air in the house, and very likely have done something good for your health.
 

11ant

2025-06-10 15:08:24
  • #2
Decentralized is better in the sense that every piece of duct is also a breeding ground for everything that the filter lets through. See
 

Papierturm

2025-06-10 16:56:05
  • #3
Another point besides mold prevention and heat recovery: There is a residential area nearby where there is definitely above-average fine dust and soot development. I know a few people there. Those who built or live with ventilation (whether central or decentralized) have completely inconspicuous walls. Everyone without ventilation has to paint the walls every few years because otherwise, they really look worn out.

I don't know how significant this effect is in a normal residential area. Certainly much less. However, I found it impressive and can imagine that depending on the location, one might also have to paint the walls less over the years.
 

nordanney

2025-06-10 17:27:38
  • #4
Living in the countryside, I can confirm it. Much less dust in the house - you still notice when the tractors are in the fields and/or straw and hay are being made.
 

MachsSelbst

2025-06-10 20:08:58
  • #5
Well, that might fit if you built in the London East End of the 1870s.

On the topic of whether it’s worth it... is it worth building a new single-family house? Is an energy-efficient renovation of an existing property for 200, 300,000 EUR worth it? Nope. For 300,000 EUR you can heat for 50 years at 6,000 EUR per year.

The advantage is that you hardly have to ventilate anymore. The disadvantage, especially with the decentralized solution, is that in summer you constantly let in the heat and especially the humid air, while in winter the air is usually too dry.
 

nordanney

2025-06-10 20:50:29
  • #6

Is it completely different with central? Even decentralized there is a crossflow heat exchanger and bypass.
 

Similar topics
20.02.2014damp walls at terrace doors and front door11
19.11.2013Walls made of Styrodur or Styrofoam?10
27.03.2014What must be considered when removing or relocating walls?10
12.06.2014Walls of a new single-family house, ground floor runs crooked, defect correction construction defect19
28.06.2015Tile walls before floors?11
13.02.2017Ventilation in new buildings (central vs. decentralized), noise disturbance69
04.01.2017Plaster walls in new construction or use fleece?16
02.08.2017Costs for interior finishing: flooring, walls, ceilings24
06.04.2018Floor plan change - Load-bearing walls in the apartment. What to do?14
18.07.2018Garage construction made of concrete! 3 walls or house extension? What do you think?26
29.07.2019Replaster/re-clad walls (with photos)12
27.11.2020Myth?! "Breathing Walls" What is the truth?54
15.04.2020Unrenovated single-family house from 1973 - Renovation or new construction?32
05.02.2021Is renovating old buildings worthwhile?42
21.08.2021Walls painter fleece / ceiling lime paint?22
19.04.2017Electroosmosis to renovate damp walls11
10.09.2021Plaster Q2 walls with roll plaster or other recommendation?27
17.05.2022Decorative tiles - 3D tiles - show off your special walls34
08.02.2022Cost estimate for the renovation of a single-family house from 196019
06.04.2023Tile patterns on bathroom walls26

Oben