Hello Sigi, thanks for your reply. I had written that I had intensively dealt with the question beforehand. It is clear to me that floorboards were screwed onto a substructure in the past. Nowadays, this is usually only done if a load-bearing screed is missing - or if one absolutely wants to avoid the adhesive. But it costs considerable room height. It is also clear that in new buildings, gluing is the most common and sustainable installation method. I think these are commonplaces. That you brought the humidity data back into the discussion might be quite helpful for some readers.
I had already mentioned the clip method in my initial post. It is said to be very expensive; do you have any information on who offers such a thing – I could inquire there. I have never heard of an adhesive mat. Do you perhaps have a manufacturer for that? I would also like to get some information about it.
However, I actually wanted neither clips nor a mat, but to lay it like click parquet. You write that, in such a case, you would only glue the short sides. As I said, I have never heard of that. Neither that you should glue the long sides, nor that you should not. But usually, click parquet can be glued on BOTH short AND long sides. Well, this is prevented by the three layers and moves less.
My timber dealer, anyway, has no opinion on floating installation (let alone an instruction manual). He says he knows people who apparently have done it once. He has no more information on it.
And if the type of bonding is decisive for any of my three questions: For solid floorboards, a random bond is usually common due to the varying lengths.
Oh, and to the others: No, no underfloor heating is planned. Please excuse my delay. By the way: With 20mm oak with a thermal resistance value of about 0.2 m²K/W (+ maybe 0.01 for the adhesive), gluing would also be suboptimal. If it’s solid wood, you take a maximum of 15mm. But whom am I telling that?
Regards michael