Inheritance semi-detached house - Will or land register decisive?

The alternative would have been to pay for the care. There was a house that could have been used for that. They always say the house is the retirement provision ;) Or one could have transferred the remaining shares of the house in time to the two other children. Then the inheritance would also have decreased by 10% each year and after 10 years there would be nothing left to inherit for the "mistreated" son who takes care of nothing.

That would have been the alternative if grandma had not completely refused care by a nursing service more than twice a week. We don't even want to start talking about the nursing home.

Yes, that could have been done – then these 8% compulsory shares would not have been incurred. But again: I am just the grandson, I was never involved, but am merely interested in buying the house now. It is not meant to be a gift; a reasonable price is to be determined. It would only be very suboptimal if one person could now block this.

The alternative would have been if grandma had not completely refused care by a nursing service more than twice a week. We don’t even want to start with the nursing home.

Yes, that could have been done – then these 8% mandatory contributions would not have been incurred. But again: I am only the grandson, I was never involved, but am merely interested in buying the house now. It should not be given away, a reasonable price should be determined. It would just be very suboptimal if one person COULD block this now.

Hello, the third son can of course block the whole thing. Demand an excessive price or refuse altogether. Just address it factually.

If nothing works, a compulsory auction must be obtained.

I forgot about the compulsory portion. But it must be claimed and could perhaps also be compensated in other ways.

The compulsory portion is only a monetary claim and not a share in the house. If it is claimed and cannot be covered by the liquid assets, the other heirs have to pay it.

As far as I know, nothing can be blocked in a community of heirs. The opposite is true: any heir can demand the dissolution of the community, then the inheritance is sold or auctioned.

of course, in a community of heirs you can block everything since all decisions must be made unanimously, regardless of individual shares. This applies to selling, renting, renovating, and everything else. The only way to dissolve the community is through a forced auction. You have to apply for it at the district court and finance it in advance.

First of all, we don’t even know one side of the story completely. Who exactly knows what happened? Therefore, I consider moral judgments inappropriate.

Secondly: Establish contact. Talk to the uncle and suggest having an appraiser commissioned by him to determine the value. You can then buy at that price. It is the fair price, indirectly set by him, and all parties are satisfied.

First of all, we don't even know one side of the story completely. Who exactly knows what happened? Therefore, I consider moral judgments inappropriate.

That will remain the case and that's not what this is about here. Basically, I have everything I wanted to know. Thank you very much!