That’s why I asked about the benefit, or rather about the contour lines. A dormer in the general alignment of the eaves can also offer this effect of "occasionally higher knee walls," combined with the wall projection another point for an added cost is added.
Ok, I have now read up a bit and think I chose the wrong term and we are actually talking about the same thing. (I meant something like in the photo, more the flat version).
I will change the floor plan and wall thickness if the software allows it. (Which software is actually best for this?)
But as I said, in the end a professional should do it properly, for me it is about the preliminary planning, the orientation (location of rooms and house type; placement on the property).
I just don’t know if the rooms facing more to the north won’t be too dark. I also read that children’s rooms should not face north because children should grow up in "light."
That would rather speak in favor of House Variant 1, where the windows upstairs would face east and west. In Variant 2, a child’s room always faces north unless I could put our bedroom there (3.5m wardrobe), then the child’s room could also be in the dormer facing west.
I don’t really like the stair layout in Variant 1 either; all the paths from upstairs to the kitchen/living room are somewhat far. My wife likes a living/dining/kitchen area in an L-shape, but that is hard to achieve on the north plot; she worries it will all feel like a long corridor.
We actually want only three children’s rooms upstairs (about equal size, approx. 12-16 sqm), a bedroom (with room for the 3.5m wardrobe) and a bathroom with shower and bathtub.
Downstairs kitchen/dining/living room, utility room, an office/guest room (which should become our bedroom when we are older) and a bathroom with shower.
I (as a complete layman) think that connection costs for the utility room in a northeast location cannot be "that much" more expensive than a southeast location.
If you have better suggestions, always bring them on, I’m open to everything.
