Home network cabling with POE access points

  • Erstellt am 2019-02-21 13:12:23

EdStark

2019-02-22 08:32:08
  • #1


Devices that do not support 5 GHz usually do not require high speeds. Where it matters, smartphone, laptop,... you should fully rely on 5 GHz.
 

rick2018

2019-02-22 08:33:44
  • #2
Then just take the HD like me ;)
Then you have enough power at both frequencies.
It's best to plan so that in the areas where you spend the most time or always need a fast connection, there is always sufficient 5GHz coverage.
It’s more like vacuum robots, wearables, etc. that can only do 2.4GHz. Everything else runs on 5GHz.
 

Malz1902

2019-02-22 08:34:22
  • #3
Not every laptop can do 5 GHz :D But 90% of the time you should prefer 5 GHz, you just have to keep in mind that the range of 5 GHz is not as far as 2.4
 

EdStark

2019-02-22 08:35:49
  • #4


The HD for 285,- is really excessive for a private household.
 

rick2018

2019-02-22 08:36:31
  • #5
Therefore, plan properly with the 5 kHz coverage. Laptop without 5Ghz??? With Win 3.1 on it? So in the last 5 years, everyone should be able to do 5ghz.
 

rick2018

2019-02-22 08:40:31
  • #6

I did say it was a bit overkill. That's why in the new house it will mostly be NanoHDs.
We use almost exclusively 5GHz, so the lower throughput at 2.4GHz is not relevant for us.
Overall, our new network is designed very generously (10Gb router, etc.)

When we renewed the network at my parents' place, the Nano wasn't available yet. That's why they have HDs everywhere.
Exactly the same with us in the current apartment.
 

Similar topics
06.09.2017General: Network, TV line, bus system56
02.06.2016Conduit Costs - Network, SAT, Backup14
05.03.2020Set up network with Unitymedia28
03.06.2020TV / SAT-TV / Over the network or distributor and via cable in the new building?14
04.11.2021The secure, upscale network in the single-family house59
19.10.2020Cat. 7 network from main house to annex underground27
14.05.2021FTTH/Network/DECT/IPTV is it correct?27

Oben