Higher visual privacy behind a regulation-compliant enclosure?

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-06 11:02:02

Igoraks

2018-01-06 11:02:02
  • #1
Hello dear community,

this is my first post in this forum and I am looking forward to your feedback!

My partner and I have found a plot of land in BW that we would like to buy. It is a corner plot of approximately 770 sqm. There is no sidewalk around the plot.

We have the following concerns: according to the development plan, the fence adjacent to the streets may be 0.80 m high. As a privacy screen, this is not sufficient. The plot is located in such a way that our garden would lie exactly between the two intersecting streets, so a privacy screen is desired.

The question we have is whether we can erect the regulation-compliant 0.80 m high fence around the plot and plant a hedge behind it at a certain distance (e.g. 1.5 m) that functions as a privacy screen (e.g. 1.70 m high).

Would that be a legally permitted solution or would the hedge then be classified as a fence and thus be too high?

If it is allowed: where can I find information on how high the hedge may be and at what distance from the fence it must/may stand?

Since we haven't bought the plot yet, this is an important factor for us as everything else fits. Good location, wonderful view, and quiet neighborhood.

Looking forward to your feedback.

Best regards Igoraks
 

Mycraft

2018-01-06 11:42:50
  • #2
Hmm high hedges are a welcome invitation for professional burglars and also opportunistic thieves. I would think about it three times, unless the property is in an area with an extremely low burglary rate.

Otherwise, just apply for a permit for the higher enclosure.
 

Alex85

2018-01-06 11:49:56
  • #3
Just plant the hedge along the boundary. It will then randomly grow taller than 0.8m and if someone complains, you can still take action.

We also had the thought process of setting the enclosure according to the development plan and putting something taller behind it, because then it wouldn't be an enclosure anymore. The planners (architect vs. surveyor) had different opinions about that. However, they agreed that after respecting the setback area, i.e. at the latest after 3m, you can put anything you want there (as long as it doesn't require approval).

Incidentally, privacy screening can be created not only by a tall hedge, wall, or fence. A gardener knows enough ways to do this without having to hide behind a wall for 20-30m.
 

Igoraks

2018-01-06 11:55:25
  • #4


,

thank you for your answer.

I can't say much about the burglary rate since I don't know these values. I also think the low enclosure at the corner makes sense.



I had that consideration too. But if a car accident happens at the fork, the injured party could draw attention to the too high enclosure, and in the worst case, I would have the trouble. Cutting the hedge afterwards would then be the least of the problems.

However, as I understand from your text, I could make a hedge 3 meters from the boundary that is, for example, 1.80 m tall (so permit-free) and would have, on the one hand, the regulation-compliant enclosure at the boundary and enough privacy screening for our privacy.

Did I understand that correctly?

Thanks and regards,
 

Nordlys

2018-01-06 11:56:48
  • #5
I suspect here—unfortunately—a real reason for the 0.8 limit. Road traffic. Otherwise, you can't see if someone is coming from the right. They are merging roads, you say. So I guess simply letting it grow higher won't be tolerated here. Karsten
 

Alex85

2018-01-06 11:57:15
  • #6
Right, I didn't think about the corner situation. You definitely have an issue there.

After 3m, that should no longer be a problem, according to the assessment (but be careful, this stuff is in the state building code, the L stands for "Landes" - I’m NRW, you’re BW).

Is there really much traffic there at all, so that one should fear "observation"?
By the way, only adults know that problem; playing children on the lawn couldn't care less who’s watching.
Wrapping a seat up a bit so it’s not easily visible should not be a problem.
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
28.08.2013Separate land and generate building land? Where to inquire?14
06.12.2019Neighbors' bushes on our property...37
23.04.2018Hedge is gone29
21.12.2017Development plan - 1.5-story building?16
03.05.2017Is terrain modeling allowed on the property?20
20.04.2017Development plan for a multi-family house16
09.03.2019Garden wall 105m² up to 2.5m height as enclosure - which system?35
17.10.2017Separate lawn from hedge? How to do it visually nice and affordable?10
28.02.2018Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible118
08.05.2018What kind of enclosure is allowed? Is a bamboo hedge also permitted?48
18.08.2020Natural garden with hedge instead of fence98
24.08.2019Privacy screen - which tree is suitable?10
16.08.2021Wood privacy fence - planning over the top? Alternatives?114
10.04.2022Hedge in snail shape to hide trash bins18
18.04.2024Floor plan design: Single-family house; with basement; 800 sqm plot10
17.09.2024New development area - sloping plot19
09.09.2024Building on family-owned property - green space with ground monument37

Oben