Heritable lease with equity capital - claim by the heritable lessee

Thank you for your answers.

Does anyone have experience regarding the reversion due to personal use? This case is not regulated in the contract, so it neither excludes nor includes it.

That is unusual. You probably mentioned it, but with whom would the contract be concluded again? When in doubt, ask the notary, they should know.

This case is not regulated in the contract, so it neither excludes nor includes it.

Not regulated = excluded

Not regulated = excluded

ok, that means if the contract under "reasons for reversion" does not state d) due to personal use, the ground lessor has no chance to register? The internet, including reputable sites, view it one way or the other.

That is unusual.
You probably mentioned it, but with whom was the contract concluded again?
If in doubt, ask the notary; they should know.

Which contract do you mean? Contract A for the house with party 1 and contract B for the land with party 2, as is usually the case.

Which contract do you mean? Contract A for the house with party 1 and contract B for the land with party 2, as is usually the case.

I meant, who the leaseholder is. Municipality, church, private individual...