Height of the attic at 28-degree pitched roof

  • Erstellt am 2012-09-29 16:23:55

VanTide

2012-09-30 11:51:38
  • #1
The house is exactly 10.33m wide and the exterior walls are 33.5 cm thick. But I think you mean the width of the house as the sides where the roof slopes go down, right? There the house is only 8.79m wide.
 

VanTide

2012-09-30 12:15:09
  • #2
Hi, yes, the eaves are 8.79. thank you
 

barcuda

2012-09-30 12:56:02
  • #3
With an external dimension of 8.79 m, the internal dimension remains 8.12 m with a 33.5 cm external wall. If the knee wall is measured as described as the inflection point / transition of the inner wall cladding from the finished floor to the sloping roof cladding, the theoretical height at the highest point of the extended sloping roof cladding is 3.76 m. The roof structure is not taken into account, as it is located above the sloping roof cladding. With a clear room height of 2.52 m and a ceiling thickness of 0.27 m, about 1 m of height remains in the roof apex (depending on the thickness of the sloping roof cladding, since it certainly does not extend up to the ridge). Please also consider any ridge purlin or scissor beams. You probably hoped for more storage space, but it is only a crawl space. Have a nice Sunday wishes baucoach.
 

VanTide

2012-09-30 17:49:22
  • #4
Wonderful, thank you for your help
 

TomTom1

2012-09-30 20:04:41
  • #5


Morning!

Only one question remains: Why would you build like that? Two-story not allowed? Maximum height 1.50 m? Afraid of windows?

At least from the outside it really doesn’t look that good.

Cheers,
Tomtom
 

TomTom1

2012-10-01 08:25:30
  • #6
Hi!

The costs don’t matter at all – if you compare apples to apples. The few extra bricks are peanuts in terms of cost; but of course, windows and blinds cost more than a bare roof surface with tile covering. However, if you compare the costs of dormers and/or roof windows, it looks different.

A two-story house with a hip roof (city villa) looks great, and you can gladly do without sloped ceilings in everyday life. The most important thing, however, is summer heat protection – under a tile roof, I never want to have to sleep again!

And if money – as always – plays a role: build a shed roof! It’s cheaper, more practical (standing height) – but visually a bit more modern.

Oh yes, the appearance spoiled in your planning is not the roof, but the knee wall (Drempel) – such a large area without windows looks like a barn – and interruptions like bay windows or a third gable are even more expensive.

Best regards,
Tomtom.
 

Similar topics
20.07.2013Do the costs increase with a higher knee wall?12
21.02.2014How high is my knee height?20
09.04.2015For porthole, special regulations? Window, single-family house 1.5 stories.18
07.09.2015Kniestock height 2-story windows eaves side14
31.07.2016Electrical inspection, Q2, bathroom tiles, knee wall, floor-to-ceiling windows23
29.05.2016Single-family house, single storey, knee wall, upper floor window30
12.10.2016Kniestock lowered afterwards34
26.03.2017Raising knee walls: feasibility, costs, alternatives?10
21.08.2017Attic size at 1.50m knee wall height10
02.02.2018Is the knee wall too low? What does the measurement refer to?22
25.04.2018Kniestock Danwood House in Schleswig-Holstein - What is the maximum possible?23
10.06.2018Build a house with a knee wall 75cm high or two full stories? Your opinion?17
18.01.2019Full floor or with knee wall?20
27.08.2019Building plan stipulates knee wall is inadmissible16
30.10.2019Increase knee wall height - exceed eaves height?22
27.12.2019Low ridge height results in a low knee wall55
01.09.2020Are building plans with a 1m knee wall still up-to-date?16
24.07.2021Extension or knee wall height increase?12
02.11.2021Bathroom planning new construction - knee wall 1.80m13
20.05.2023Large dormers or high knee wall?33

Oben