smartsurfer85
2022-10-02 01:11:14
- #1
I was already pleased that so much has been written on this in such a short time!
Criticism of the drafts is also welcome.
I do not understand this criticism at all:
As already mentioned, the planning has paused and it is probably clear that nothing else has happened.
I experience it here in the area like this: The agenda is "creating living space" and the district office is overruling the local council, the technical committee, etc., especially regarding §34. It feels like whatever can be built is being built here.
Before I go to a planner/construction manager, I want to have an idea of what I want or what I consider possible.
Criticism of the drafts is also welcome.
I do not understand this criticism at all:
. Now that half a year has passed, one would have to question the seriousness of your house construction, right?
Especially because the OP apparently still hasn’t managed to get a binding statement on the maximum buildability from the office. In the time, I would already have a complete preliminary building inquiry answered right in front of me.
As already mentioned, the planning has paused and it is probably clear that nothing else has happened.
I experience it here in the area like this: The agenda is "creating living space" and the district office is overruling the local council, the technical committee, etc., especially regarding §34. It feels like whatever can be built is being built here.
Before I go to a planner/construction manager, I want to have an idea of what I want or what I consider possible.