11ant
2023-07-20 14:24:58
- #1
It is also said: "the other way around it makes sense". The sequence is wrong. First create the concept, and then see which examples can be found to fulfill it.We have looked through the floor plans for orientation and have already seen many floor plan options from various prefabricated house manufacturers. Unfortunately, there are always 1-2 points here that we do not like at all and for which we have no solution approach.
I still find unanswered what the motive was to involve the draughtsman – especially after reading that CAD is also being used – even more so. Incidentally, the very best professional tool is ordinary squared notebook paper – occasionally after four decades of floor plan planning I still use it myself when I run out of napkins to scribble on ;-) "Professional" software is usually no good: the efficiency is abysmal. For a single project (i.e. a single-family house for oneself, without ambitions to become a builder oneself) the effort of learning the software (to put it nicely) is "not worthwhile". And one can’t need better elaborations anyway, because the architect can “process further” the squared paper sketches no worse by a jot. Besides, afterwards you are still not an architect, but at best a trainee draughtsman.And yes, our draughtsman has been retired for a few years now (actually funny that you can tell by the floor plan), he was a site manager for 20 years and is a trained master bricklayer. Many plans from private and industrial clients in our region pass over his desk.