11ant
2021-11-04 21:24:49
- #1
pointing out where pitfalls could lie here since we also made small changes here
You have already found those yourself and even pulled hard on them: namely the changes that were lied about without blushing as being small. Take the maxim yes or no, but half measures are worthless.
Current dimensions are 10.10x10.10m
Because you ironed out the "bay window." As economical as it may be not to provide one, it is unwise to cut out one that belongs to the design concept. You can also change the roof to a gable roof and then extend it over the "bay window." However, I would leave the hip roof here; as a truss construction, it is not such a budget bomb as it is as a rafter roof. You can do a gable on a square, but it visually looks a bit as if the house were narrower than deep. Straight flights of stairs are poorly suited for a ridge direction perpendicular to them.
The symmetrical arrangement of the windows causes headaches in a townhouse
They vanish as if by magic when I tell you that there is no such townhouse symmetry law. At least not in DE, I have not checked in AT and CH.