Financing - where is the mistake?

  • Erstellt am 2016-01-09 22:20:31

Legurit

2016-01-12 19:46:33
  • #1
Repaying BAföG early is only worthwhile if it results in a significant debt reduction... if it's just 10,000 €, you might as well pay it off over 8 years and meanwhile put the money into a [Tagesgeldkonto] at 0.05% interest. It doesn't bring you much, but at least 200 €; not a bad reward for setting up a standing order.
 

Schemelino

2016-01-12 20:01:53
  • #2

My wife and I also each had a maximum amount of 10k, then had to pay 7.7 and 7.5 because it was immediate...

It was definitely worth it.
 

Legurit

2016-01-12 20:14:19
  • #3
In these cases it is of course worthwhile - but if you have received 34 T€ (i.e. 17 T€ debt) and after all deductions still exceed the 10 T€, you can also simply repay the 10 T€ over time.... in my opinion, no bank cares about that and it does not appear anywhere. Anyone who started studying after 2001 does not have to repay more than 10 T€ under any circumstances, whether in installments or in a lump sum - at least that is my understanding.
 

Legurit

2016-01-12 20:54:11
  • #4
The BAföG loan is at least not listed with [Schufa].
 

ElaNi

2016-01-12 21:20:41
  • #5


Thank you, that is important information. Then it really makes much more sense in our case to arrange an installment payment. You have helped me a lot! Thank you!
 

toxicmolotof

2016-01-12 21:31:55
  • #6


I want and have to question this post. This has never been the case with construction financing, is not the case, and never will be. The majority of the financing (and the risk costs) is solely based on the security "house," which should normally amount to at least 80%. It looks somewhat different with 115% financing, but this is rightly advised against by banks here. So the conclusion: The interest rate conditions for construction financing are not dependent on income. Dependent on income is solely a decision by the bank, and that decision is: Do we do it or do we not.

Lying around in the sense of "will be contributed to the house construction." Otherwise, you could also have a million lying somewhere.

But at the latest in the obligatory self-disclosure it must be declared. Banks very rarely like lies or simple omissions. The Schufa doesn't matter at all and is practically irrelevant anyway.

That depends... but others here know more about that. Apart from interest costs, it’s always just right pocket, left pocket.
 

Similar topics
09.04.2013Construction financing in Berlin33
29.11.2013Is construction financing possible for a sauna?14
30.09.2014Construction financing in cash - which account?14
01.04.2016Construction financing | Is the procedure good? Your opinion and tips160
04.04.2015Separate construction financing?10
14.08.2015Construction financing... realistic and sensible?19
27.08.2015Which construction financing is suitable for us?10
17.12.2015Kfw funding 2016 - How to set up construction financing?10
18.03.2016Debt restructuring in construction financing36
10.01.2017Construction financing without equity capital, but with other liabilities36
16.01.2018Construction financing - is it possible to reduce the interest rate?30
18.12.2019Construction financing despite a very bad Schufa score60
23.04.2019Experiences with DEVK Construction Financing10
26.08.2019Consumer credit as equity39
24.10.2019Financing condominium despite bad Schufa score14
16.10.2020Building a house with a low Schufa score16
30.12.2020Is construction financing possible for an individual?22
15.11.2022Construction financing despite EU pension43

Oben