super, thanks for the hint. That is of course not true. Both cars are less than 2 years old and fully paid; no financing and/or credit. The 800 euros are of course per year, so we simply make it 100/month. With the second income, we can currently definitely save 1,000 / month, but it is still quite new since B has only been working for 2 months and before that we lived only from A’s income with corresponding additional costs for language school, additional costs for ABH and similar.
So I am at monthly fixed costs of about 2100 euros instead of 2800!
@ DNL: Those are the kind of answers I was hoping for and not those that miss the point.
Where is the thinking error? Where are current additional costs to be expected that are not covered by equity? Please break it down if you define it so concretely.
The fact from my point of view is: 10,000 reserves for floors and walls are available 8,000 reserves for kitchen are currently being built up and will be available at the move-in date 187,000 external capital is needed, I cover the remaining 35,000 ceiling through - existing - equity
There is still the move for 1,000 euros, 150 euros for the door lock including key and from me 500 euros for the garden gate. Let’s add another 350 euros for small things like address changes, mailbox or family name sign and house number. That makes 2,000 euros, I can also manage that, we do not need to philosophize about it now.
It is clear that additional costs for a few extra pieces of furniture will arise, but that probably does not belong in the financing or evaluation of income/expenses in house construction. Also, a complete finishing of all rooms etc. would be possible afterwards if it really became financially tight.
So which significant additional costs are missing from your point of view?
Once again: I have asked concrete questions on the topic of financing and income/expenses and not on the topic of construction, location, scope, technical description or anything else. If I say that the house is turnkey (with listed exceptions) then it is so and must not be questioned and therefore also does not have to be answered to open up sidetracks. It simply does not belong to the topic.
As for the rest of your post: LOL. I do not beat my chest, but consider it extremely unprofessional of moderators to publicly make fun off-topic about the way a case description is done. If they have nothing to say on the topic of financing and costs, they should simply leave it alone. All topic-related questions or feedback have been answered by me—as far as I have not overlooked anything—and I try to present this transparently and also broken down (also so as not to lie to myself). Whether the house is now built in OWL, Kleve, Cologne or in the Ruhr area is completely irrelevant when it comes to the financial situation and/or its evaluation.