Environmental liabilities in the planned house - cost bearer???

  • Erstellt am 2010-10-28 12:52:11

Juvabr

2010-10-28 12:52:11
  • #1
Hello,

I am new here. A few weeks ago, we purchased a planned terraced house including the land from a property developer (fixed price). Now construction has started and it looks like contaminants (presumably tar) have been found under the land. Today we will probably receive the results of the soil samples.

Our question is therefore, what is the legal situation if contaminants are indeed present? The plot is the last gap in a larger new development built a few years ago. Originally, there was a brickyard on the site. There were no problems with contaminants at the other houses. Various trial drillings before construction began also revealed no relevant indications.

The current owner is still the developer; we already have a priority notice of conveyance registered in the land register. The notarial contract contains the note that "the parties were informed by the notary about owner liability regarding contaminants." However, to our knowledge, he did not elaborate on this, and currently the developer remains the owner until the final payment is made.

Finding the polluter will likely be difficult, as the developer purchased the land from an insolvency estate.

Our question therefore is, how are the costs handled? Does the developer have to pay for this because of the fixed price (soil removal must be done at his expense), or are contaminants a special case and is this problem ours?

Thank you very much for the answers!
 

Bauexperte

2010-10-28 15:04:53
  • #2
Hello,

I would like to assume that unfortunately you drew the Axxxx card :(

Two things: at the notary appointment, the notary read the contract aloud and asked you if you understood everything. It should also have included a clause that relieves the transferor from any liability regarding contaminated sites/property. If you answered yes to this question without further inquiries to the notary, the first problem exists.

Every reputable seller informs potential builders about possible additional costs that may arise from a soil report. Are you 100% sure that the seller omitted this? You have to prove this omission to him, which will probably be quite difficult if no independent person was involved in the conversation.

Suggestion: calmly wait for the result of the geological soil report and then discuss options for damage limitation with the seller/developer. However, I think it will be purely a goodwill gesture if he participates in the costs of the necessary soil replacement.

Kind regards
 

Similar topics
23.03.2011Developer or architect?15
25.03.2012Land now - house construction next year23
03.08.2012Contract Supplement to the Construction Contract by the Developer36
14.01.2014Buy land let build dream house26
23.06.2014Developer charges heavily for replanning - justified?12
08.10.2014How do you search for a suitable property developer?30
06.01.2015First buy the plot, then calmly plan and build...?11
27.02.2015Construction project with a developer without an official building plan, is a down payment required?12
13.06.2015New construction with developer / construction drawing documents23
19.01.2018Clearing and preparation of land12
11.11.2015Forced auction - land claims by two parties11
15.03.2016Developer changes plot size25
16.03.2016Single-family house - developer rejected25
17.05.2016House Building Prices: Architect vs. Developer10
10.09.2016Construction financing and contract with the developer24
02.12.2016Plots in Cologne only through developers?54
01.11.2016Property developers in NRW. Can anyone recommend good property developers?10
21.03.2019Construction description from our developer13
06.01.2020House purchase, prefabricated house from the developer with land10
07.11.2020Notary contract land inspection: should it be done or not?24

Oben