Draft single-family house with approx. 168 m² feedback

I have sliding doors over 2m; they were very heavy for the craftsmen, but move effortlessly; yes, of course not with the little finger, you need a bit more strength than for 1m doors. However, I didn’t want to unnecessarily chop up the windows.

First of all, my great praise that you worked analog in the plans, and then also right away with furniture templates to move around.
Due to the smoothing of the bay window line, the upper floor becomes a bit larger, for which the bathroom and one of the children's rooms (which would benefit from this without further changes) probably won't have use to this extent. Thanks for that too, because it excellently illustrates my advice to derive the ground floor from the upper floor instead of the other way around.
My surprise about the wall thickness simply arose from the fact that I do not know any manufacturer who even has this stone thickness in their range. There may be one, otherwise the planner would hardly think of using this format, but that would probably limit the choice of manufacturers already (?)

Possibly thermal blocks?

Maybe thermal blocks?

After KS at 20 cm, it was probably only a matter of time until an intermediate size was invented. Let’s see if and when it catches on; then I could be okay with it – only if it limits the selection of manufacturers do I not like it. If I have a "neutral" wall thickness in submission plans, I can switch more easily than with wall thicknesses where only a few manufacturers make stone X and possibly none make stone Y. But well – at least it pleases me that above 36.5 cm we don’t start immediately with fortress walls, but only take 10% more.

Is also available in 500mm

There is also in 500mm

More is better *LOL*