Demolition and reconstruction of a bungalow

  • Erstellt am 2016-05-10 09:11:42

Legurit

2016-05-10 09:11:42
  • #1
KS or full clinker :D
 

Cico1

2016-05-10 09:37:24
  • #2
I would like to build without [WDVS].
 

Legurit

2016-05-10 09:55:01
  • #3
Then 49 cm T8 or so...
 

wpic

2016-05-10 10:43:53
  • #4
You must clarify with the building authority whether a new development of the same size is possible after demolition, or whether building and planning law complications arise due to the loss of existing rights. For the construction project, you need an architect (building application, possibly a preliminary building inquiry) and a structural engineer, possibly a surveyor. Demolition above a certain size (in NRW 300m3 gross cubic content) must be approved by a demolition application and carried out by certified demolition companies with proof of disposal. Depending on the construction age, the bungalow may be special waste from the regrettable era of prefabricated houses of the 60s/70s.

Your basic considerations regarding the choice of materials are contradictory: bricks with high bulk density have a low thermal insulation value but provide good sound insulation. The heat storage capacity of a building material plays a minor role in our latitudes and has nothing to do with the thermal insulation value/thermal conductivity of a material.

You therefore have the choice between an external wall construction with high bulk density (brick / calcium silicate) + additional ETICS or a monolithic aerated concrete (porous concrete/high-hole brick) at least 36.5, preferably 42 or 49 cm without ETICS, but with poorer sound insulation. Depending on the location of the plot and external noise levels, this construction may not be sufficient.

Furthermore, the Energy Saving Ordinance applies, which defines the energy standard (final energy consumption / transmission heat losses / primary energy demand) of a new building. This affects the choice of heating system, which must be matched to the shell as an insulated building envelope.

Building has become more complicated and more expensive.
 

Similar topics
12.12.2019Solid house: Which stone / brick?23
07.09.2012Single-layer masonry vs. double-layer masonry with ETICS19
13.04.2012ETICS, exterior wall, insulation, energy experts' experience reports19
29.08.2015Exterior masonry made of aerated concrete and interior walls made of brick?16
13.03.2016How to move from KfW55 to KfW40+?23
16.02.2016Shell construction: Cracked bricks11
19.06.2016Insulation reveal window WDVS and clinker plus transition12
01.02.2021Y-Tong (aerated concrete) - quality building material? (sound insulation!)91
01.11.2020Prefabricated house, poor sound insulation85
25.01.2020Which material is suitable for the shell construction (thermal and sound insulation)?20
18.07.2021Unfilled bricks and soundproofing - looking for experiences36
11.06.2020Sand-lime brick + ETICS, Ytong or sand-lime brick 2-layer14
02.11.2020Exterior walls 24cm hollow bricks: WDVS or Poroton T7?29
20.02.2021Exterior wall for KFW 40 (+) with or without ETICS?86
09.04.2022Building material selection: Brick or aerated concrete - Sound assessment on the topic26
30.05.2022Brick filled or unfilled, relevant for interior sound insulation?25
22.08.2022Is insulation useful with Poroton bricks?19
15.06.2023VHF vs WDVS facade - 1970 old building concrete/brick15
17.05.2023Same price: Kfw55 with Poroton monol. OR Kfw40 with Poroton WDVS?31

Oben