"No incubator center" – however, I would create one – is only acceptable if you have another concrete definition of which desired tenant profile(s) you are targeting instead. The success of a property development stands and falls with the precision of the target (group) definition. If, on the other hand, your motivation is limited to turning vacant spaces into cheaply rented spaces (because that at least brings in a little more and costs little), then you will only get more of the same kind of Smurfs as tenants as before. Half-heartedly furnished, only as a small room with a shared microwave, a communal kitchen will look like a pigsty. If, however, you consistently create opportunities for interaction (a large table where even individually ordered food can be eaten together, a chill zone, and so on), tenants meet, learn to perceive others as fellow human beings, and suddenly toilet brushes are even used. Where you can see and (not) smell a guiding hand (cleaning fairy or more), even an "old-fashioned" property is not perceived as unattractive. Even without a glass elevator, the level of a property is raised if a concierge service receives packages or provides information to visitors. That does not have to be expensive – I know a property where the reception is always staffed simply because it is rented to a car rental company. There is always someone there, kindly showing the way to the other tenants, and by reciprocity, such small services are not even charged. If, on the other hand, you position your property like a train station prostitute out of investor stinginess, then tenants from Sodom and Gomorrah will come as well.