In our municipality, the land use plan was created on the drawing board and simply followed the field boundaries. This led to the confusion that grassland in the outer area was suddenly considered as building land – and the farmers were annoyed, being asked if they wanted to sell. In fact, the areas were not usable as building land since they were still entirely or partially in the outer area. Land use plans are often prospective declarations of intent and not yet detailed. A parcel of land can be partially built on and only partially lie within the inner area. In many municipalities, the outer area begins exactly at the wall of the building.
Okay, thanks, that helps me understand the whole thing.
But I could play dumb during the conversation at the district office and say: it is declared as residential building land, so it seems to be in your interest to build there :-)
Something like that..
Only a small part of the village has a development plan, the vast majority stands outside.
Does the proximity to the barracks play a role?
Are there newer houses in the area outside that you can use as a reference?
Yes, that is correct. The development plan is from the 80s. The rest of the village is older. I don’t know if the development plan is related to the barracks. But the part covered by the plan is further away from the barracks than the old village.
There is currently construction going on in the village, yes. Partly in building gaps and apparently an unauthorized building near the barracks in the outer area, which is currently “paused” (not a good example). Whether there are other building projects in the outer area, I need to find out. Thanks for the tip!