Hello,
in 2011 we founded our house (12x11.5m) as follows due to the soil surveyor (clayey soil, swelling and shrinking possible -> possible building damage):
- Geotextile of GRK 3
- at least 30cm gravel subbase to achieve the required "bedding modulus", compaction must be proven by plate load tests
- 10cm Floormate 500-A
- 30 cm rigid concrete slab made of WU concrete
(then we waived the sealing of the slab with tar paper(!), since WU concrete of this thickness does not allow anything to pass through anyway)
----------
Our garage had to be founded separately (strip foundations) (even though the architect initially planned it differently (continuous)...) in order to
a) avoid thermal bridges and to
b) obtain a clean boundary closure (the gravel must protrude at least 30 cm at the rigid slab and maintain a certain slope)
--------------
Important: The grounding must be led out of the now well-insulated slab!!
---------------
The insulation cost over 4k€, but we also saved money on sealing.
--------------
The exterior walls are made of Poroton, inside of KS bricks, all without insulating bricks on the base slab.
-----
Floor structure ground floor: 20cm (underfloor heating), of which 10cm insulation
-----
Why all this??
No one could initially answer that directly, but we educated ourselves and came to the following conclusion:
Energy savings:
Nice and good, if you use the calculation examples on the web, insulation under the slab never really pays off anyway.
Last winter I had not yet completed the surrounding perimeter insulation on the slab (at the house entrance I still had to pour a foundation for the step) and lo and behold: the facade was ice cold, only at the open spots of the concrete slab was the concrete nice and warm. Certainly quite a bit of heat is lost there because the whole slab is heated even though there is 10cm insulation inside!
What is interesting, however, is the dew point formation!
By insulating under the slab, the dew point is now shifted further outward.
That means mold formation on the floor area can now be almost ruled out. That might not be so bad for us (solid construction), but is certainly less than optimal for timber frame construction.
--------------
I hope this info from a construction layman helps with further decisions.