Construction financing with a low fixed rate

  • Erstellt am 2016-11-14 16:17:47

Musketier

2016-11-21 06:56:29
  • #1
Wrong. Everyone has the right to that. Whether one wants to sue their employer if necessary is another matter. However, you do not have a legal claim to a full-time position from a part-time job if the part-time position was not limited to a certain period.
 

Uwe82

2016-11-21 08:38:49
  • #2
Thank you for the correction, I didn’t remember it correctly anymore. The problem, however, as you say, is that the employer has a right to object if there are operational reasons against part-time work. And that can then be sued for. And when I hear from acquaintances how it went there, I would be cautious. Likewise, many employers recommend expectant mothers to apply for the full 3 years of parental leave, with the argument: "Shortening is easier than extending." However, if you want to start again after 1 1/2 years, the employer is not obliged to provide a position until the end of the requested parental leave. Again, there are exceptions here, but also the question of whether you really want to sue your employer. It is also uncertain whether you can or want to return for family reasons after the planned time. Therefore, the rate should also be bearable by one person alone, at least the main earner.
 

HilfeHilfe

2016-11-21 08:58:17
  • #3
It is also great when mothers in a dormant employment relationship are advised not to return anymore (with severance pay / termination agreement)

we are currently fighting
 

Knallkörper

2016-11-21 09:50:36
  • #4


Since when can you take 3 years of parental leave? Isn't 2 years the maximum, and that at half the amount?
 

Ghostwriter

2016-11-21 09:54:06
  • #5

Parental leave is not the same as parental allowance
 

HilfeHilfe

2016-11-21 10:18:52
  • #6
correct, last year you stay at home for about that long
 
Oben