Cleaning damage on facade – is the developer's response sufficient?

  • Erstellt am 2025-08-13 13:53:10

ypg

2025-08-13 19:09:30
  • #1

What distinguishes a normal complaint from a formal one?
As already said: It is the beginning of a procedure, and if indeed no deadline was set, then in any case a lawyer from your side should be contacted.
Because if the complaint was indeed not formal with a deadline, then you don’t have much time left.
 

Blaexe90

2025-08-13 19:09:48
  • #2


I wonder how you even come to the conclusion that I would decide anything here for the WEG? We owners are in contact and can only decide on something through a resolution anyway.

Your post is slightly off topic right now. I have asked for professional assessments so that we can together make the most informed decision possible.
 

11ant

2025-08-13 19:20:11
  • #3
I do not come to the conclusion but fear that you belong to the "Team Galama," and you have not yet taken any position on your role. Now one from Codo's star center, formally no more responsible than the others. That is what I thought and advised you to protect yourself by consulting a professional (for legal matters, because you need that here). Again: this is not a matter of cleaning technique expertise, but of doing things right legally, and for good reason, the legal advice law has not left that to phone jokers.
 

Blaexe90

2025-08-13 19:26:19
  • #4
I honestly have no idea what you are talking about with "Team Galama" and so on. You also don’t need to have any concerns. And why you repeatedly advise me to "consult a professional" is beyond me. I can’t do that at all. Obviously, you are not aware of how a WEG works.

Not that I need to justify myself here, but I am the one responsible for involving a lawyer. The other owners are not necessarily. Accordingly, I need professional arguments to convince them why the statement of the developer is insufficient. Because they basically want to carry out repairs.

Either you can contribute something professional or not. If not, please refrain from further "suggestions" of this kind. Thank you.
 

ypg

2025-08-13 19:59:22
  • #5

Actually, they are already stated several times in the two posts.
 

Blaexe90

2025-08-13 20:16:40
  • #6
Obviously, something must have impregnated the reinforcement fabric against bonding with the plaster. Thus, the plaster has remained an independent and apparently only film-thick layer. This is the only technical statement so far on this topic. The large remainder were conjectures on a personal level and condescending, provocative remarks.
 

Similar topics
06.03.2018Klinker or plaster? Durability / appearance?19
30.01.2015New building exterior facade clinker/plaster12
04.07.2015House contract with financing condition, lawyer wanted10
28.04.2016Order screed - plaster14
24.01.2018Is the floor still too wet or is it already normal?27
02.08.2018SchwörerHaus: Seam in the plaster between two floors? Is that so?27
01.02.2019Mineral plaster instead of textured wallpaper?23
21.07.2020Lawyer wanted to sue the construction company52
16.02.2020Joints visible on the plaster!27
19.03.2020Lime-gypsum plaster crumbly and therefore defective?21
11.04.2020Construction law - hire a lawyer or not yet16
04.05.2020Can Q2 plaster be wallpapered with fleece wallpaper?16
05.07.2020Is sanding Q2 plaster yourself an option?15
06.07.2020Facade design for single-family houses, feedback and ideas, broom finish plaster41
12.10.2020Q2 Plaster cracks / minor defects - is this a defect or tolerable?17
16.06.2021How can we broaden our niche? Sanding plaster?11
23.06.2021Large crack deeper than the plaster! How dangerous? Renovation costs?11
21.02.2022The plaster has discolored and is peeling off10
01.04.2022New construction: painter’s fleece or just plaster?11
28.06.2024Building permit - is a lawyer useful?12

Oben