Circumvent the municipality's prohibition on transfer

Let's put it this way, my father-in-law was a notary and if he refrained from something for legal reasons, then it was for a good reason. If several people see no option to find a clean solution, then that's quite a statement. With a single opinion one could still think that it is just an opinion. Several notaries? um, no good prospect for a good outcome.

Leave it. After your consultation with the [Gemeinde], they now already know that you are looking for a way to get to the building plot. They will be watching the further developments with eagle eyes...

He would want to sell it to us at cost price. The selling price is more than attractive. Even if it were twice as high.

What if you, for example, pay 1.5 times the cost price and the seller agrees in writing to the municipality to donate the difference between the selling price and the cost price to, for example, the volunteer fire department in the village?

How long has the seller been in possession of the property?

Can someone explain what the term [bebaut] in the contract means?

In my opinion, it does not say anything about the quality or quantity.

I do not read anything about [bezugsfertig] there.

How long has the seller been in possession of the property? Can someone explain what the term "bebaut" means in the contract? In my opinion, it says nothing about the quality or quantity. I don’t read anything about "bezugsfertig".

"The restriction on disposal expires upon completion of the move-in ready residential building." And then the entire following § 15? Of course, one could try to challenge the whole thing with a specialized lawyer, but how long does that take? And what are the chances of success? Maybe there is also an obligation to build within a certain period? I assume the current owner has no interest in a buyback to avoid the associated costs and is therefore desperately looking for someone who finds a trick to circumvent these clauses.

I spoke with the municipality. They are not willing to negotiate. The seller has several construction projects and now wants to sell it for private reasons. He would want to sell it to us at cost price. The sale price is more than attractive. Even if it were twice as high.

And you believe that? If there were a solution, the professional seller (with several projects running) would have long since used it. Why would anyone, even if it's just in the countryside, first try to get a property only to then sell it "at cost price" with book losses? The delta plus a bit more (loans are cheap if you already have something), and a 120m² simple house would be on it and ready for sale.