Otus11
2018-06-21 13:09:39
- #1
I had already read through §648a (5) Baugesetzbuch, but what is an important reason?
The important reason must above all come from the sphere of the termination recipient (typical case: contractor does not fix defects or waits it out, does nothing after the deadline expires, is bankrupt. Here possibly: He has no properties – but owes one according to the contract (which might then again be a property developer business...). If I have to look for the property myself after the contractor insolvency, this does not apply.
The rest is in § 648a I 2: Baugesetzbuch:
An important reason exists if, taking into account all circumstances of the individual case and weighing the mutual interests, continuation of the contractual relationship until completion of the work cannot be reasonably expected of the terminating party.
=> So it depends on the circumstances of the individual case and the reasonableness of continuation.
Colloquial test question: Is this ever going to work out?
**Edit:
Of course, you can also "mutually terminate" the contractor and also gladly ask for that...
Peace, joy, cheesecake, and pony ranch.
The meaning and purpose of the clause is obviously quite different (only for money -> own business model?). Possibly the 10% clause as lump sum damages is also ineffective under AGB law; 5% remains as delta but might still stand)