Bauherr am L
2019-08-30 09:02:51
- #1
As I said, the terms were generally worse when the self-employed person was included. Sometimes a surcharge was even explicitly stated. Better conditions were only available with Part 1 as the sole borrower. Your logic sounds plausible, but that's not how the conditions look.That's not true. They just check more thoroughly because the risk could be higher (but doesn't have to be). The terms do not automatically get worse just because an additional co-borrower is present. What could happen to the bank? The self-employed person runs their business into the ground and the employee must be able to repay the loan alone. It's no different than if the employee had taken out the loan alone from the beginning. At least that's how we proceed (we grant tens of thousands of loans to homeowners and buyers every year).