Wouldn't a garage or the space in front of it reduce that even further?
Here is the answer:
exceeded: - In WA 1 (our area) up to a value of 0.5
. .
100 sqm would really be very little – walls etc. would reduce the actual area even more, right?
No, the floor area ratio refers to living space.
First lived in yourself,
Once again: A granny flat is a separate residential unit that is equipped so that one can live there independently of the main apartment. It is an apartment, but subordinate. Mostly because of its size. Nevertheless, it is separated by a secure lock on the apartment door from your main apartment!
with the option to later let parents live there.
How many sqm do you want the parents to live in? Or do you mean locking them away? Sorry, after #7 you should really read through the entire building code and additionally your building regulations. There are fundamental gaps. That’s not bad. However, building a house is too complex to wish to build a “Villa Kunterbunt” on a community plot. And no: the floor area ratio regulates the total living area, whereas the site coverage ratio regulates the buildable land area. Honestly, I’m waiting for you to correct your opening thread and improve by meaning site coverage ratio. That makes more sense with 256 sqm for a semi-detached house development. Floor area ratio would be quite small and would deter the target group because families won’t be found there. At least not at the plot price. However, I can also imagine that 2 residential units on a semi-detached house plot are not allowed. It is very likely that you are mixing things up out of ignorance. That is not bad either. What is bad or not good, though, is that you plan your thoughts on an imagined basis. And that does not lead to the goal. Anyway: Granny flat in a semi-detached house that you want to live in yourself on a 256 sqm plot is one of the worst ideas I have ever read. Focus on your needs and room program as well as the development plan, which we do not know.