MaxPower90
2016-05-22 19:29:20
- #1
thank you very much for your detailed answer! Separating taxes and liquidity makes sense, I will do it that way from now on.
The nearly 40% tax rate is correct, if I’m not mistaken. I simply entered the data for the hypothetical apartment in my 2015 tax return, which I have already completed, as if I already owned it. Then there were always just under 40% deductions, but also refunds on, for example, interest.
I deliberately left out the depreciation because it apparently only applies to buildings up to 50 years old, as I have read.
What I can’t understand is the following:
First of all, I did not start from the gross rent, but from the net rent. And secondly, in my view it does not make sense to deduct the transferable ancillary costs from my rental income on the income side, because those are borne 100% by the tenant. Or am I seeing this wrong?
The nearly 40% tax rate is correct, if I’m not mistaken. I simply entered the data for the hypothetical apartment in my 2015 tax return, which I have already completed, as if I already owned it. Then there were always just under 40% deductions, but also refunds on, for example, interest.
I deliberately left out the depreciation because it apparently only applies to buildings up to 50 years old, as I have read.
What I can’t understand is the following:
if you consider the gross rent when calculating income, then you must also consider the entire ancillary costs as expenses
...
Gross rent = 12 x 400€
- Ancillary costs in full = 12 x 150€
First of all, I did not start from the gross rent, but from the net rent. And secondly, in my view it does not make sense to deduct the transferable ancillary costs from my rental income on the income side, because those are borne 100% by the tenant. Or am I seeing this wrong?