Building plan with different eave heights

  • Erstellt am 2020-05-05 14:04:22

Mavis42

2020-05-05 18:33:37
  • #1


ditto
 

Mavis42

2020-05-06 07:54:47
  • #2
Good morning everyone,

Can no one help me further?
 

Pinky0301

2020-05-06 07:58:59
  • #3
Have you asked the city or the building authority how this is to be understood?
 

Mavis42

2020-05-06 08:34:47
  • #4


We tried. Unfortunately, we only got a very vague answer. There is supposedly a slope, and then these eave heights must be observed. Regarding the reference point, one should somehow calculate the center of the terrain and use that :/

As mentioned before, there is a slight slope from west to east and from north to south, so it is unclear to us whether the 3.5 m eave height should be to the north, that is behind the house, or basically related to the left side of the house?
 

11ant

2020-05-06 14:47:44
  • #5

Well then, you see examples of an apparently desired interpretation of the regulations by the development plan issuer. That is more useful here than me saying that, to my knowledge, it is unusual. Your building community obviously likes asymmetrical roofs. Not the dream of my numb feet, but it is also a way to create uniformity through "all equally ugly". But even from that, an architect can make something of it.
 

Escroda

2020-05-06 19:22:55
  • #6
The house ground is the "three-dimensional floor plan" of the building. Through it, sections are made and submitted as construction templates, e.g. the ground floor plan, which is a horizontal section through the house ground, 1m above the finished floor level of the ground floor. Thus, is correct. That depends on what you want to build. For a city villa, you need a different plot. A single-story house with a gable roof can also be nice and would be possible here. I can. The city planners wanted single-story construction; the 5.70 m is also not enough for two story heights. On a slope, this is difficult to implement, so they allowed a basement, which could even be a full story. If they had allowed two stories from the start, on the valley side the impression of a three- or even four-story building could quickly have arisen, because the additional stories are not considered full stories according to the state building code. Additionally, they resorted to setting maximum eaves heights to definitely prevent this impression. This leads to asymmetrical roofs with too steep or too shallow slopes under the premise of maximizing living space. I suspect the city planners did not have this approach in mind at the time. That is not relevant, since the ridge direction is given. It is about comparing the heights on the right side of the ridge with those on the left side. This determines valley side and uphill side. Clearly, on an almost flat plot, the result might not be clear. But that would then be a reason for exemptions due to atypical plot conditions. Well. They themselves don’t understand what the predecessors intended back then. Perhaps the justification for the development plan reveals something. The statute itself certainly does not. It’s about the maximum value, i.e., the height difference most unfavorable to the builder. That’s how it looks according to the description. Only a surveyor can provide certainty – as so often.
 

Similar topics
08.01.2014Opinions on the hillside property22
14.01.2014Plot on a slope; embankment - retaining - costs?10
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
31.08.2016What slope is still comfortable?12
23.10.2016Secure the property17
21.11.2016Misplanning Bavaria - slope towards house and garage - instead of away23
19.08.2020Floor plan design for a two-family house on a slope246
15.03.2018When is a slope a slope? Basement vs. slab19
26.04.2018Plot on a slope, height difference approx. 4 meters12
24.04.2019Single-family house with garage on a gentle slope17
14.04.2020Steep slope property, please provide an assessment17
22.12.2020Floor plan of a single-family house with a flat roof on a 600m² plot19
25.04.2021Initial floor plan on graph paper: slope, basement + 2 floors.80
08.06.2021Single-family house planning on a slope (2,700 sqm plot) - Experiences / Discussion42
19.08.2021Plot on a slope in the Munich outskirts - how to decide?54
09.02.2022Floor plan: Building on a slight slope - not enough for a basement due to excavation?22
17.03.2024House planning with 3 children's rooms on a 473 sqm plot31
08.08.2024House placement on a plot on a hillside curve, where will the house be located?66
17.09.2024New development area - sloping plot19
05.06.2025South-facing plot 700 sqm, single-family house approx. 150 sqm, any ideas or input?41

Oben