Building permit from 1931 not adhered to

So, I have to defend the newcomer. Please, read... he is talking about a 3m extension, which apparently once served as a stable and is now used for residential purposes. In his photo, he shows the house entrance, not the extension. 3m! Not the entrance portal. Also, to me he clearly writes that the extension is there and was just not approved, nothing about anything being demolished or that something was or will be demolished. And the question was merely: Should I do something to retroactively legalize the whole thing, which has been like this since 1931. Escroda answers him in detail what he can do, but hints that you don't actually have to do all that. That is also my opinion. The rest here was completely off. Karsten

But what is supposed to be done with the photo from the initial post then? That, just like the misleading text, is rather confusing.

Well, he showed us the house once. Why don't I understand that, miss?

Well, he showed us the house once. Why don't I understand that, miss?

Oh well... sometimes you have the right mindset, sometimes I have the wrong one. It happens.
You, Karsten, have also often read posts incorrectly or only skimmed them.

Yvonne, it’s not about misreading once, but about obsessing over trivialities. He has apologized to escroda for the three !. Period, case closed. And his photo is not the issue at all. Anyone with eyes can see that there’s no extension on it. He himself, of course, also goes quickly upstairs, as they say in the North. However, read the entire thread calmly. A real example of how humans and orangutans are similar in territorial behavior. K.

So, I have to defend the newcomer.

Content-wise, I had wanted that too, but atmospherically the OP just stormed in so nicely that I lost the desire ;-)