Escroda
2021-07-18 23:14:10
- #1
That may be the perspective of the building permit issuer, the building inspector’s view will certainly be different.The friendly clerk at the building authority said quite openly that the smartest thing would have been simply to build so that the houses fit together
Yes, that is often perceived as a hard lot.he unfortunately had to act
Well, that too would fit the stereotypical narrow-mindedness of a bureaucratic stickler, inflexible and impractical. However, we do not know all the circumstances of this case, so condemning the outcome of the actions would be unfair. Nor do we know – at least that applies to me – all the circumstances of the OP and his neighbors. Free-standing or permitted? Developer or general contractor or general subcontractor or …? Staking out by surveyor or foreman? Site management by architect or owner? Building authority overloaded or cooperative? Necessary construction supervision certificates?and ensure that at least the second semi-detached house is built according to plan.
Consequences of unauthorized extensions with attentive building authority: building stop, fine, new building submissions, exemption application, supplementary approval. Between the devil and the deep blue sea – the OP must decide. Perhaps he will get infected neither here nor there, certainty only afterwards.Now the semi-detached houses stand offset from each other, it looks poor and causes additional costs because parts of the walls have to be insulated additionally and unplanned.
What does your responsible design author, that is the one who signed the building application, say about that?Now I wanted to build and gladly stay within the permitted building envelope.