Raiweired
2021-06-16 13:08:53
- #1
Hello,
I have been following for a few weeks and have an important question before awarding the contract.
I am building a turnkey city villa (catalog house) with an air-water heat pump, living area approx. 118 sqm, the planning contract has been awarded. The general contractor offers standard according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 and increases the price for execution in KfW55 by approx. 13,000.00 euros for improved insulation under the floor slab and ceiling above the upper floor and replacement of bricks from Poroton T12 to Poroton T9.
The subsidy for KFW55 is 18,000.00 euros, the subsidy for KfW55 EE is max. 26,250.00 euros.
If I build in KFW 55, I calculate additional costs of 13,000.00 euros for improved insulation, 2,000 euros for the energy consultant and 10,000.00 euros for a decentralized ventilation system. This uses up my subsidy. On the other hand, according to my research, there is only a minimal saving of approx. 100.00 euros/year with KfW55 compared to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 on electricity for the air-water heat pump.
Of course, the higher price expected in the event of a possible sale speaks for KfW55, but I do not intend to sell.
Otherwise, the savings compared to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 to KfW55 are only marginal. In addition, the additional ventilation incurs maintenance costs.
With KfW55, the house is sealed so tightly that fresh air must be supplied again through fans. You pay for the increased insulation and then for the ventilation needed to compensate. Houses according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 are not so tight and do not require ventilation.
I am putting the topic up for discussion.
I am curious about the various opinions.
Regards
Raiweired
I have been following for a few weeks and have an important question before awarding the contract.
I am building a turnkey city villa (catalog house) with an air-water heat pump, living area approx. 118 sqm, the planning contract has been awarded. The general contractor offers standard according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 and increases the price for execution in KfW55 by approx. 13,000.00 euros for improved insulation under the floor slab and ceiling above the upper floor and replacement of bricks from Poroton T12 to Poroton T9.
The subsidy for KFW55 is 18,000.00 euros, the subsidy for KfW55 EE is max. 26,250.00 euros.
If I build in KFW 55, I calculate additional costs of 13,000.00 euros for improved insulation, 2,000 euros for the energy consultant and 10,000.00 euros for a decentralized ventilation system. This uses up my subsidy. On the other hand, according to my research, there is only a minimal saving of approx. 100.00 euros/year with KfW55 compared to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 on electricity for the air-water heat pump.
Of course, the higher price expected in the event of a possible sale speaks for KfW55, but I do not intend to sell.
Otherwise, the savings compared to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 to KfW55 are only marginal. In addition, the additional ventilation incurs maintenance costs.
With KfW55, the house is sealed so tightly that fresh air must be supplied again through fans. You pay for the increased insulation and then for the ventilation needed to compensate. Houses according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 are not so tight and do not require ventilation.
I am putting the topic up for discussion.
I am curious about the various opinions.
Regards
Raiweired